Tuesday, March 31, 2009

 

Basi Virk Basi - this Morning in Courtroom 67 - March 31, 2009

.

By Robin Mathews



The morning was almost beyond belief.

Outward appearances, one more time, were smooth, well-dressed, and orderly. The universe was unfolding as it should...apparently. Nine lawyers, a judge, (with five or six in the gallery) were sitting before a document list from BC Rail. Madam Justice Elizabeth Bennett turned pages and turned pages and went on and on, saying 'document W is relevant, document X is relevant, document Y is not relevant and..and..and'.

What was going on was simple. And it was totally unnecessary.

In my judgement, it is happening (and will continue, more or less, to happen all day) because (as I see events) the Gordon Campbell government is doing everything it can to prevent the world from knowing the manipulations, misrepresentations, shady actions, and - even perhaps - lawless things done to fake BC Rail out of ownership by British Columbians and slip it into the ownership of CN.

If the cabinet and its connected agencies had conducted public business concerning BC Rail openly and transparently, they could have made all documents available long, long ago. (Why should government conduct of the people's business be so 'cloak and dagger', so in 'the shadows'? So secret?)

If the transactions within BC Rail itself concerning the alienation of BC Rail from ownership by the people of BC had been conducted openly and transparently, all the related documents could have been made available long, long ago. (What actions went on in BC Rail that need as much hiding as can be arranged?)

The documents would have been made freely available to the public as well as to the Defence lawyers for Basi, Virk, and Basi long ago. And so this morning's activity was part of a delaying and obstructing game, to these eyes.

If the B.C. public wanted to see plainly that the Gordon Campbell government has a great deal to hide, the public needed only to sit this morning and watch what might be called "fake justice" playing out in Courtroom 67.

This morning Defence got 80 new documents from BC Rail. Remember that BC Rail joined the protocol used to gather seventeen binders of documents (the 8000 pages) from government departments. Two of the binders were of BC Rail documents. Counsel for BC Rail objected to their inclusion as documents the Defence could use. Madam Justice Elizabeth Bennett upheld the BC Rail objections and ruled that a small number were privileged and the larger number were not relevant to the Defence of Basi, Virk, and Basi.

Upon consultation with the independent nominee who gathered the FOI documents as relevant, Defence applied to have them named relevant. Today, after Madam Justice Elizabeth Bennett had ruled on the relevance or irrelevance of her previously named irrelevant documents, Court recessed for an hour so that Defence could consult again with the independent nominee and prepare, perhaps, another application to have the documents now named irrelevant reviewed.

Remember. This is happening, as I see it, because the Gordon Campbell government is unwilling to have the people of B.C. know about the steps taken to sell BC Rail, after solemn promises not to sell it.

In that regard some might believe, as I do, that Madam Justice Elizabeth Bennett is not concerned enough about the people of British Columbia in the matter, is not nearly impatient enough with various kinds of delay.

Michael Bolton, for the Defence, said outside the courtroom, the documents in question were not uncovered by the RCMP in their investigations, but Defence believes they may have important relevance to the political agenda of the sale of BC Rail, as well as to various legal and accounting issues, and to the withdrawn port subdivision sale. We remember that the (withdrawn) sale of the Roberts Bank part of BC Rail is connected to allegations against the accused.

No mention of Patrick Kinsella - who may have have been working for both CN and BC Rail at the time - was made today. But there will no doubt be more action on that file before a long time has passed. On everybody's mind there are questions. What did he do for either side or both sides? What was his contract? Or what were his contracts? What direct connections did he have with Gordon Campbell (known as a friend)? What were his instructions from either side of the sale - and did they conflict?

Questions. Questions.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

 

Sub judice, the Stonewally version

.
In the BUSINESS section of today's Vancouver Sun, there's as nifty a piece of comeuppance as we're likely to see this side of paradise. To see and hear Wally's performance -- the basis for Palmer's column -- go to Sean Holman's news site, Public Eye Online. Recommended. - BC Mary.
________________________________________________


BUSINESS

Stonewally delves into the world of sub judice

Attorney-general again fends off questions about Kinsella

BY VAUGHN PALMER,
VANCOUVER SUN - MARCH 31, 2009


The New Democratic Party Opposition raised another issue in the Patrick Kinsella affair Monday, hoping to chisel an opening in the stonewall the government has constructed around its relationship with the prominent B.C. Liberal party insider.

Kinsella's own organization has boasted about its role in helping privately owned Accenture land a $1.4-billion outsourcing deal with publicly owned BC Hydro. What about it? the New Democrats challenged Energy Minister Blair Lekstrom.

But as invariably happens when Kinsella's name is raised in the legislature, Attorney-General Wally Oppal delivered one of his preemptive "the matter is before the courts" answers.

But, but, but protested Opposition MLAs {Snip} ....

[Then Attorney-General Wally Oppal says to Vaughn Palmer:]

"The sub judice rule -- why don't you write a column about that one day, instead of skating around the outside? You're the guy to do it.

"The media have done a pretty poor job of explaining the sub judice rule. It is easier for you guys to call me Stonewally. Why don't you take the time and explain the rule and the historical origins of the rule? The media have abysmally failed to do that."

Good suggestion, Mr. Attorney. Sub judice and how it applies to matters before the house, coming right up. {Snip} ...


Wow. Give it a read.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

 

Basi Virk Basi today 10:00 AM

.
File #23299

- Aneal Basi
- HMTQ vs Limited Access
- Bobby Virk

Vancouver Supreme Court today March 31, 2009, 10:00 AM.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Monday, March 30, 2009

 

" I oppose the sale of B.C. Rail."

.
DEBATES OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY
Monday November 17, 2003 - Morning Sitting
Hansard Volume 18, Number 6

Second Reading of Bills

BRITISH COLUMBIA RAILWAY ASSET PROTECTION ACT 2003

P. Nettleton: I rise in support of this bill, which is a private member's bill intended to stop the sale of B.C. Rail.

My perspective is a little different, I think, from the members of the opposition, in that my first encounter with folks in Prince George who had strong feelings with respect to B.C. Rail dates back to 1996 during the election campaign, when I was going door to door with my wife. I hadn't lived in that part of the country terribly long at the time, so for me it was an introduction of myself, and it was also an opportunity to listen and learn from folks in terms of what was important to them.

One of the things that was brought to my attention during that campaign — as I say, it was the campaign of 1996 — was that B.C. Rail was an issue that ran very deep in terms of people's emotional attachment. During the course of that campaign, I also ran into a number of men — I don't know that I ran into any women, but certainly a number of men — who supported their families working for B.C. Rail. I recall some of them telling me, in fact: "You know, you seem like a decent enough guy, and the B.C. Liberal Party is a party that has a lot of appeal. But B.C. Rail is, for us, a big issue, and that's an issue on which we're going to cast our vote." This meant, in fact, that the vote would be cast not for the B.C. Liberals but rather for the NDP.

That was my first introduction to B.C. Rail and, as I say, the strong sentiment not only in Prince George but beyond with respect to the issue of B.C. Rail and the sale of B.C. Rail. The election of 1996 — for those of us that were there, and I know there are a few members here who were there in 1996 and were fortunate enough to be elected in 1996 — certainly didn't have the result that I had expected, in that I was the only member elected as a B.C. Liberal in the north. Certainly, B.C. Rail was part of that outcome, I expect.

Following the election — the election which saw a majority NDP government and a very strong but nevertheless unsuccessful B.C. Liberal opposition — one of the things that happened was the then Leader of the Opposition, who is now Premier, met with us. I recall him meeting with me in Prince George and assigning roles to members of the then opposition, now government, to take on critic portfolios. I remember meeting with the Leader of the Opposition, and he assigned to me the role as critic of B.C. Rail. So I gladly took that task on.

For those of us here that recall what it was like to be a critic, I think there were a lot of benefits in terms of really digging deep into a given ministry, or a subset of a ministry in this case. B.C. Rail, of course, fell within the ministry for which the then minister, Dan Miller, was responsible, which involved northern interests, energy and mines, and so forth. I gladly took on that role. Again, as I say, it had been brought to my attention during the course of the election. I knew that the then Leader of the Opposition had committed to the province as a whole that he would sell B.C. Rail, and there was some sense in which that was problematic, particularly for those candidates of the north that were defeated.

Being a critic involved doing a number of things beyond just asking questions during the estimates process. It involved the opportunity to travel to North Vancouver and meet with the then head and CEO of CN and head of B.C. Rail, Paul McElligott, and his board. Paul McElligott, who is now the CEO of TimberWest, was really a free enterprise kind of guy. Under his watch, B.C. Rail was really run in very much a free enterprise type of setting, as much as one can achieve that within the context of a Crown corporation. It was highly diversified; it involved much more than just the railbeds. It involved BCR Ventures, which involved joint ventures in mining and so forth throughout the north. It had a real estate arm, it had a telecommunications arm, and it had Vancouver Wharves. In any event it was highly diversified, highly successful, and paid large dividends to the provincial government at the time — millions of dollars every year. Well, not every year, but certainly it generated millions of dollars, and on occasion it was tapped for those moneys.

It was interesting to meet with Mr. McElligott to get some sense of the challenges with respect to B.C. Rail. One of the things we did as critics, of course, was report out to the other opposition members with respect to our findings as to the direction, in this instance, of B.C. Rail.

My position personally hasn't changed with respect to B.C. Rail. I understand, I think, something of the emotional attachment with respect to B.C. Rail from men and women who have in many cases worked their lives on B.C. Rail and have seen the north opened up to development and opportunity and growth, and so forth, as government has shown a commitment to the north by way of B.C. Rail over the years. My position certainly hasn't changed, but the Premier, the then Leader of the Opposition, following the election of 1996 publicly made an apology with respect to B.C. Rail. Our position — that is, the B.C. Liberals' position on B.C. Rail — firmly committed that we had learned our lesson. In fact, we would not sell B.C. Rail should we be successful in 2001.

Now, the B.C. Liberals talk about new-era commitments. I took that to be a commitment. I took the Premier, the man who's now the Premier, at his word — that when he said we would not sell B.C. Rail, he was as good as his word. That, we now know, is not the case. Shortly after the election of 2001, we see a government that has moved very quickly. There's been speculation as to why that might be, why there's been this flip-flop, this breaking of the commitment on B.C. Rail. I think the opposition has laid out rather carefully and in a way that people can understand some of the reasons why, perhaps, government is now moving as it is to sell B.C. Rail.

One of the things I will say quickly in closing, because I know I'm running out of time, is that the public sentiment with respect to B.C. Rail — the same sentiment that I encountered in 1996 going door to door in Prince George talking to people — hasn't changed. People are for the most part, along the line and certainly in Prince George and beyond, opposed to the sale of B.C. Rail — what's left of B.C. Rail, given that B.C. Rail now really is just the freight service. Everything else has been sold off, so B.C. Rail is not what it used to be.

That public sentiment hasn't changed, and I'm delighted to be able to stand here today in support of this bill which has been introduced by the opposition. Thank God there's something of an opposition here. I shudder to think what in fact would happen if there wasn't. I'm delighted to stand here for my constituents and say that I support this bill, and I oppose the sale of B.C. Rail.

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
These notes from the Hansard record of debate are-posted here, as a Thank You to that heroic figure who stood up for British Columbians at a time when he stood alone as an Independent M.L.A. for the northern riding of Prince George - Omineca. This is a a debt to remember. - BC Mary.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Saturday, March 28, 2009

 

March 28, 2009 - Gary Mason, Ian Bailey, Les Leyne, Times Colonist editorial, Neal Hall

.
As election looms, new revelations about BC Rail stir up waters
Gary Mason
The Globe and Mail - March 28, 2009


VANCOUVER — B.C. Liberals are hoping new questions regarding Premier Gordon Campbell's involvement in the controversial sale of BC Rail back in 2003 fade away – just as they did then.

But it may be different this time ...

Read Gary Mason's complete column HERE. Recommended.

______________________________


BC Premier sticks to 'no comment'
Ian Bailey
The Globe and Mail - March 28, 2009

Politically correct. Might help if readers act fast and leave comments, before The Globe and Mail closes off further submissions.

Read Ian Bailey's complete column HERE.

______________________________________

BC Rail needed management smarts
Les Leyne
Times Colonist - March 28, 2009

The reader of this next column may require boxing gloves. But if you can take the punch-up, it's a useful test of where the issues are important, and where they are not. Of course, it leaves out the question of "How did we lose BC Rail?", but here are two gems from the pen of Les Leyne:

Quote: ... but here's something that needs to be said: His [Kinsella's] $297,000 contract with B.C. Rail was a flat-out farce. And the explanation given for it is an even bigger farce. Imagine a government-owned entity hiring the ranking government relations expert in B.C. in order to get advice on how to deal with the government.

On what planet does that scenario make any sense? Since when do Crown corporations need government relations advice?


Quote: B.C. Rail, in an unsigned statement, said the contract ran 49 months, from 2001 to 2005, and he was paid $6,000 a month. But the whole core review exercise -- that searching examination of everything government was doing -- didn't even last half that long. It was a distant memory by 2005.

The management geniuses kept shelling out $6,000 a month for outside advice for about two years after the conclusion of the project on which they were seeking advice.

If nothing else, the contract and the justification explain why B.C. Rail was such a dead loss as a business enterprise. The management was so completely bereft of business smarts they had to hire outside help to tell them how to get along with their only shareholder.

And if you buy their ridiculous story, they kept him around for years longer than needed.

It leads to a paradoxical conclusion: The sale of B.C. Rail was a good deal, if only because it rescued the company from management that didn't even know how to deal with the government, let alone run a railway properly.

Read Les Leyne's complete paradoxical column HERE.

Excuse me, Les: BC Rail was NOT a dead loss. Not even close. Where'd you get that idea? - BC Mary

________________________________________________________

We need answers on Kinsella's role
Editorial
Times Colonist - March 28, 2009

Quote: ... It is important to avoid prejudicing the accuseds' rights to a fair trial; it's also important to recognize the public interest in the sale and its handling.

And it is possible to reconcile the two. The trial is not being heard by a jury, which provides more latitude for answers. Judges are considered able to ignore information that is not relevant or admissible in reaching their decisions, unless it is extremely prejudicial. ...

Full editorial HERE.


Apart from the usual back-handed swipes at the Opposition -- as if the New Democrat Opposition had sold BC Rail in a secret deal -- this is an interesting new statement to be coming at this time from a CanWest newspaper. It poses the new question: is it really possible to ride a horse in two opposite directions at the same time?? - BC Mary.
________________________________________________________

Kinsella worked for both sides, lawyer says
NDP hits Liberals over BC Rail deal
Neal Hall
Vancouver Sun - March 27, 2009.

Read the full story HERE.

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Friday, March 27, 2009

 

Aneal Basi in Victoria court today

.
File #145212 - Aneal Basi
J.M. Doyle, Counsel
Room 103, Victoria Law Courts
March 27 , 2009 at 9:00 AM

Public Access Adult Court list

Count 1a - Care or control vehicle or vessel while impaired,
Count 1b - Care or control vehicle or vessel with over .08

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Take a look at this, says
North Van's Grumps. I did. Amazing!

Click HERE to see what Supreme Court has on file.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""


Thursday, March 26, 2009

 

Robin Mathews: morning, March 26, 2009 when Courtroom 67 exploded

.
Morning in Courtroom 67
Robin Mathews - March 26, 2009


This morning exploded. Saying that some of the things referred to in his morning submission will be important later, Kevin MCCullough, for the Defence, launched into revelations of the tight connection between the legal and the political in the BC Rail Scandal as it relates to the accused in the Basi, Virk, and Basi case.

That is just the connection the Campbell forces have been attempting, many believe, to avoid at all costs. McCullough will continue with that theme this afternoon. This morning he pulled into the web of interaction people like Kevin Mahoney, VP of BC Rail, Chris Trumpy, member of the Evaluation Committee (and point man for the deal for the Gordon Campbell government), D. McLean, president of BCR, and (the now-famous) Patrick Kinsella - who, it appears, had surprising roles in the matter. (More below)

The matters McCullough laid before the court tangle the Gordon Campbell forces in an apparent web of manipulation and micromanagement both before and after the announcement of the sale of BC Rail.

The court was fuller than usual for the occasion, with ten counsel present and fifteen observers in the gallery.

McCullough divided the area of discussion into five categories. Roughly before the announcement of the sale and after it. After the date of the announcement of the winning bidder, November 25, 2003, there were problems with the transaction, and we now know, McCullough asserted, that in May, June, and July of 2004 the deal was going off the rails.

McCullough made clear that the position of Defence is that - in the whole playing out of the bidding, the allegation of a "consolation prize" for OmniTrax to stay in the bidding, and the alleged connection of that to Gary Collins, then Finance Minister - that the three accused were following the orders of their masters. Don't assume, McCullough said to the judge, that Bob Virk gave anybody anything. (Referring, I assume, to the charges against him.)

McCullough alleged that the micromanagement of the whole issue involved leaks, information given and then withdrawn - the process wholly controlled by a political agenda. The leaks, McCullough said, were not coming from Basi, Virk, and Basi, as alleged.

A "problem" with the deal arose. The sale was announced in late November 2003. And then on December 28 2003 the media was aware that the search warrant "raids" on legislature offices connected to BC Rail. In February of 2004, the RCMP conducted some interviews and in March the sale of Roberts Bank spurline was cancelled because the process had been contaminated.

How, McCullough asked, could the government continue with the sale? If one part of the sale was poisoned, he suggested, both parts had to be.

[On March 2, 2004, the BC Federation of Labour called for a halt to the sale. "Until the public is fully satisfied there were no criminal acrivities involving BC Rail, the sale of BC Rail must be stopped" the Federation demanded.]

What Defence didn't know in early days was that the "problem" arose. The deal, as McCullough put it, was "coming apart". In May of 2004, after the announcement, CN, said McCullough, "was walking". And so on May 19, 2004 Kevin Mahoney e-mailed Chris Trumpy to tell him that Patrick Kinsella had learned from the president of CN Rail that the deal was in jeopardy. He asked what "they" can do, and referred, McCullough said, to Martyn Brown, Gordon Campbell's chief of staff.

Here we have, said McCullough, the vice-president of BC Rail e-mailing Trumpy that Kinsella has received a call from the president of CN asking anything "they" can do, which is needed now. Kinsella apparently was going to speak to Martyn Brown.

How real is this? Trumpy asks in reply. I have it, Mahnoney says, directly from Kinsella.

That brought the Kinsella involvement into dizzying perspective.

The Discovery package of documents, McCullough said, from the Crown for 2003, apparently showed Kinsella identified as a political advisor to the CN. Between 2002 and 2005, however, we know he was employed by BC Rail.

The "problem" arose, apparently, because - without consulting CN - Gordon Campbell made a television appearance in which he attempted to placate the Northern B.C. population about the deal with CN. In the presentation, Campbell apparently stated that the rail track was not in the sale. CN was alarmed because they would lose money, tax advantages and rail scheduling opportunities if that were so. Kinsella, McCullough alleged, was at that time the point man for CN.

Then in 2004 the whole matter of Kinsella's payments from BC Rail came up in pre-auditing procedures, And there the revelations of the past two weeks about payments to both Progressive Holdings and the Progressive Group were revealed. Both names standing, apparently, for Patrick Kinsella - who it is alleged was retained as a lobbyist.

As Gary Mason put it in the Globe and Mail today (March 26 09 A8), "The New Democratic Party...will undoubtedly want to focus on the increasing appearance that Mr. Kinsella was helping CN Rail with its ultimately successful bid to buy BC Rail at the same time as he was working for the seller." That is especially true since McCullough reported that Kinsella, McLean, and others met in the Premier's office about such matters - drawing Gordon Campbell into direct relations with the sale. The tight connection between the legal and the political in the BC Rail Scandal may, in fact, prove to be tight enough to strangle Gordon Campbell in the coming weeks.


""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
[*The (related) ALR case in court today at 2:00 p.m. is, I am informed, to be put over for about two weeks in a brief meeting this afternoon. - RM.]

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

 

Bill Tieleman's news from the explosive Basi Virk Basi hearing today in BC Supreme Court

.

Basi-Virk Bombshells: Defence alleges Kinsella, CN + Gordon Campbell met on BC; Kinsella worked for CN & BC Rail at same time; govt suppressed FOIs


See Bill's early report here.


""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""


 

Vaughn Palmer, Gary Mason, Neal Hall, Mark Hume, Justine Hunter, CBC News on March 26, 2009

.
Liberals stall on lobbyist reforms, stonewall on mounting Kinsella questions

Vaughn Palmer
Vancouver Sun - March 26, 2009

Surprisingly tough words from Palmer. Recommended.

_______________________________________________________________


Whiff of scandal envelops sale of BC Rail

GARY MASON
Globe and Mail - March 26, 2009

Read the full column here.

Globe and Mail's Comments thread on this story closed very quickly. The 25 comments are inaccessible. I've asked Gary if he knows why. - BC Mary.
___________________________________________

Kinsella working "both sides of the street" BC Rail deal, MLA charges

Neal Hall
Vancouver Sun - March 26, 2009

Quote: ... “This is five months after the deal has been signed,” McCullough said. “You’ve got CN on the verge of backing out and who do they go to? Patrick Kinsella, who was the campaign manager of the Liberals [in provincial election campaigns] in 2001 and 2005.”

McCullough said the documents suggest CN “was on the verge of walking” away from the BC Rail deal when it realized it would not get a “tax windfall” if the B.C. government retained ownership of the tracks. He pointed out the BC Rail deal wasn’t finalized until July 2004.

Read Neal Hall's complete news story here. Recommended.

______________________________________

Premier's closest advisor drawn into BC Rail scandal

Mark Hume, Justine Hunter
The Globe and Mail - March 26, 2009

Quote: ... “It's clear that the whole BC Rail deal, and the mess surrounding it, goes right up into the Premier's office,” Leonard Krog, the NDP Opposition justice critic, said outside court ...


Read the full column here.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Liberal lobbyist may be key player in Basi-Virk corruption case

CBC News - March 26, 2009

Quote: "We have information now that indicates the premier, Patrick Kinsella and the head of CN were all in the room together," he said ...

Read the full CBC News report here.

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

 

Big day in BC Supreme Court ...

.
There are 2-1/2 pages of Vancouver Supreme Court listings which are best viewed by clicking onto "Van Court Direct" in the left margin. There you will see listings for two separate trials.

File #23299 - 10:00 AM - Aneal Basi, Bobby Virk, Limited Access

File #134750-1 - 2:00 PM - Room 53 - Dave Basi (A.L.R.)


Several sources have already published comments that the March 26, 2009 meeting(s) will be important steps forward in the BC Rail trial.

Best advice: check the Vancouver Supreme Court listings by double-clicking on "Van Court Direct" in the left margin. - BC Mary.

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

 

Robin Mathews: "The Smoking Gun?"

.
"The Smoking Gun?" Do the 8000 Freedom of Information pages released trap Gordon Campbell in evidence of crime?

The question is dodged. It is skirted. Irregularities are recorded. Suggestions are put forward about "possible corruption", broken promises, abuse of power. Breach of trust there was. But the "C" word is not used: crime.

And then Michael Smyth, provincial affairs columnist for the Vancouver Province, reports (March 15 09) that e-mails included in the 8000 pages - among three former NDP cabinet members, and one referring to Paul Nettleton, caucus-ousted Liberal MLA, are all declared fake by three of the people involved.

Fake e-mails - and, therefore fake information - attributed to former NDP cabinet ministers, stuffed into the 8000 pages which, at the time, were to go to the Defence in the Basi, Virk, and Basi fraud and breach of trust case?

Complete fakes? Nettleton, according to Michael Smyth, thinks they connect to "the sale of BC Rail itself". "This is about possible corruption and broken promises by the leader of the Liberal Party," said Nettleton.

The mind boggles. Did all three forget? We look for some explanation that the e-mails aren't fake. The 8000 pages contain many blank pages the Campbell forces have refused to release, even though the independent nominee marked them as relevant to the Basi, Virk, and Basi case. Do the released pages contain fake e-mails, placed there as cover-up, smoke screen, something else?

And if the e-mails referred to are fake, what else in the 8000 page package is also fake? Have other things been planted there to provide false leads?

Maybe asking all those questions will go nowhere. Maybe the question should be a simple one: in the sale of BC Rail did the Gordon Campbell forces break the law? Did they commit crime?

Did the real and visible (moral) breaches of trust constitute breaches of the law, in fact?

There is growing suspicion that they did. In a piece posted on March 24, BC Mary asks how to interpret the fact claimed by Paul Nettleton (to Michael Smyth) that, in 2001 - while BC Rail was staunchly said not to be for sale (and long before sale was even mooted publicly, later, in 2003) - MLAs were called to Gordon Campbell's office and told to get "on-side and on-message" with the sale. Not only, at that early stage, did Nettleton learn, he alleges, "we were going to break our promise" but also that "we were aligning ourselves with CN".

It seems like collusion, BC Mary thinks. When placed with other evidence in the 8000 pages of what looks very like 'working together' to deceive, the sense of collusion grows.

The definition she found of "collusion" is impressive. I will quote it again, fully (from Wikipedia), as she wrote about it.

"'Collusion is an agreement, usually secretive, which occurs between two or more persons to deceive, mislead, or defraud others of their legal rights, or to obtain an objective forbidden by law typically involving fraud or gaining an unfair advantage. It is an agreement among firms to divide the market, set prices, or limit production It can involve "wage fixing, kickbacks, or misrepresenting the independence of the relationship between colluding parties.' ...All acts affected by collusion are considered void. [Examples, such as bid-rigging, are provided.]"

To begin: breach of trust was flagrant. We think of it usually as Gordon Campbell, pre-election, promising not to privatize BC Rail, and then doing it. But the breach of trust appears much worse than that - though that is bad enough - and it allegedly involves (as Nettleton suggests) a very large number of people allegedly agreeing to or being forced to accept the process of preparing and selling BC Rail to CN (colluding?).

After taking office, Nettleton alleges, the Campbell forces moved into the sale process almost immediately - while for months and months after, in fact, lying to the public. The 8000 pages contain the evidence that "the party line" was that BC Rail was not for sale while the sale was being prepared. Is that not breach of trust after public promises not to privatize and while continuing to tell the public the BC Rail was not for sale?

I quoted from the hand-written notes of Yvette Wells in my last column - Executive Director of the Crown Agencies Secretariat. Her notes from those key meetings, as I interpret them, suggest - very strongly - premeditated, organized, on-going activity to deceive about sale intentions, and to misrepresent the independence of the relationship between CN and the Gordon Campbell forces - and therefore, directly or indirectly to assist a manipulated bidding process.

The breach of trust intensifies many believed (and believe) as the bidding was undertaken. Was the public treated to a fake bidding process to cover-up the (already determined) sale to CN Rail?

Not only, some might allege, was the public treated to a fake bidding process. So were the other bidders and involved organizations. Were BNSF, CPR, Ferroequus, and OmniTRAX invited to trust a process of bidding that was, in fact, fake? Was their trust violated by the Gordon Campbell forces? The first two withdrew with strong statements of dissatisfaction about the fairness and ethical conduct of the process - one even, it seems, implicating CIBC World Markets. The third smelled a rat and wrote to Gordon Campbell that it wouldn't even bid.

OmniTRAX remained in the bidding, apparently. But a cloud is believed by some to hang over its role (whatever its innocence may be) because of charges in the Basi, Virk, and Basi case that touch upon its role in the bidding. And the cloud relates, Defence alleges, to the (pre-determined?) sale of BC Rail to CN.

Opposition critics of all stripes have been challenging the Gordon Campbell forces to "tell the truth". Perhaps they should be looking at the meaning, in law, of breach of trust.

Section 122 of the Criminal Code reads: "Every official who, in connection with the duties of his office, commits fraud or a breach of trust is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not exceeding five years whether or not the fraud or breach of trust would be an offence if it were committed in relation to a private person."

Of breach of trust (sect. 122, Criminal Code), the Ontario Court of Appeal said that the meaning of breach of trust by a public officer is "wide enough to cover any breach of the appropriate standard of responsibility and conduct demanded of the accused by the nature of his office. As a result the question to be determined in each case is whether or not the public official in question breached the public trust placed in him or her by the electorate".

If such were proved to be the case, the person in question would have to resign, and he or she would face up to five years in prison. And, presumably, if "collusion" were also proved - according to BC Mary's research - the sale of BC Rail to CN would have to be considered void.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

A similar news item on the CTV web-site: Consultant becomes target over BC Rail meetings, appears on the CTV web-site, including a YouTube showing the Opposition hammering government on BCRail, Stonewally and Premier Gamble non-replying, and police inside the Legislative buildings hauling those mysterious boxes out of the offices. Both the news article and the voice-over have a remarkable new tone, as they
claim something interesting may develop in BC Supreme Court tomorrow. Recommended. - BC Mary

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

 

"We were aligning ourselves with CN ... " approx. June 2001

.
Michael Smyth's The Province column for March 15 contains two comments from a former Liberal BC Rail critic which should cause the Basi Virk defence lawyers' eyes to light up.


Quote: ... Nettleton said he was called into Campbell's office shortly after the Liberals' winning campaign, along with other MLAs from rail-dependent Prince George, and told to get "on-side and on-message" with the sale.


So that's May 2001 + a month? two months? My guess is that "shortly after" means within a month. That puts Gordon Campbell in the bully-pulpit in June 2001. A new premier with 77 MLAs facing an Opposition of 2 MLAs. Nettleton, who had been Campbell's critic for BC Rail in Opposition, remembers that meeting:


Quote: ... "To my surprise and dismay, it became clear we were going to break our promise and we were aligning ourselves with CN," said Nettleton.


So Gordon Campbell had allegedly already decided -- and had presumably/allegedly vetted the arrangement with CN -- to shift BC Rail from public BC ownership into CN's private ownership.

Privately.

Decided.

By June 2001.


To divest the province of BC Rail.


And to align his government with CN to do that.

Allegedly.


How else can we interpret the words of an MLA who fought hard against selling BC Rail, and who advised his Liberal leader against selling BC Rail, when he says "To my surprise and dismay ... we were aligning ourselves with CN"?

I looked up the word "collusion". Wikipedia is quite clear about it:

Collusion is an agreement, usually secretive, which occurs between two or more persons to deceive, mislead, or defraud others of their legal rights, or to obtain an objective forbidden by law typically involving fraud or gaining an unfair advantage. It is an agreement among firms to divide the market, set prices, or limit production. ... It can involve "wage fixing, kickbacks, or misrepresenting the independence of the relationship between the colluding parties." ... All acts affected by collusion are considered void. [Examples, such as bid-rigging, are provided.]


I have asked Michael for Paul Nettleton's phone number or e.mail address but I doubt that a working journalist would reveal those. If anyone knows how to contact Nettleton (and some of us have tried, over the years), could you please let me know?

Meantime, many thanks to Michael Smyth for contacting Paul Nettleton and writing this column. Talk about the Law of Unintended Consequences. It was probably because of those fake e.mails that Michael must've asked Paul: did you write one of them? Paul said no, but figured that it might've been a dirty trick devised to draw attention away from something else ... ah yes, we've heard about those, too.

Read more about After 'fake' e-mails, rail trial can't come soon enough by Michael Smyth HERE.

- BC Mary.

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Monday, March 23, 2009

 

Heartland $3 Bill‏ - BC Rail Money!

 


Face - Dick Tater
Face


What was lost
Obverse/Backside

These Three Dollar Bills from the imaginary Heartland/Hurtland currency were submitted by Eddie Mazur. He created these bills "back in 2003 when (he) was a member of the "Stop the Sale of BC Rail" committee here in Prince George."

As the obverse view reminds us, not only has BC Rail gone missing, thanks to the drinkin', lyin', and stealin' Mr. Gamble - but CN should be changed to CINO (Canadian In Name Only).

Thank you for sharing these Eddie!

(click directly on each image for a larger view)

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Big Thanks from BC Mary to Kootcoot who managed to subdue this BCRail engine and post it here for Eddie Mazur, who hopes that his phony $3. bill will not be forgotten in the (ahem ...) coming weeks. Sorry to sound partisan but it's impossible to think of BC Rail's giveaway under its still-secret terms without also thinking of Premier Gamble. - BC Mary

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

 

Today March 23, 2009, 10:00 AM, Vancouver Supreme Court

.
File #23299-5 (Basi, Virk, Basi)

Limited Access & others vs HMTQ.
Application for records

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Whoa Nelly ... !!

Gary E took a second look and here's a second opinion on what happened in Vancouver Supreme Court today. Frankly, this seems extremely disrespectful of the public ...

Gary E has left a new comment on your post "Today March 23, 2009, 10:00 AM, Vancouver Supreme ...":


So Mary, another disappearing act on Case #23299

I saw it this morning scheduled for 10:00 AM. Went to the completed list tonight at 5:30 and nothing. Went back to the schedule and it had disappeared from there as well. Any word from anyone on what happened?

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""


Friday, March 20, 2009

 

Building a propaganda case for destroying BC Rail

.
Robin Mathews

Questions nag ... and nag ... about the corrupt sale of BC Rail. Corrupt. Gordon Campbell made an election promise not to sell BC Rail. Then the Campbell forces set about, semi-secretly, to break trust, under terms which excluded BC interests and that used a process which two participant bidders described as unfair.

CPR and BNSF withdrew, the latter citing "serious questions of ethics and fairness". BNSF (November 24, 2003) also complained of the "failure of CIBC to follow the process that CIBC and the government said would be followed".

Paul Nettleton, thrust out of Liberal caucus for fighting the dismemberment of BC Hydro, remarked about the sale of BC Rail on January 6, 2004, on CKPG that "the process wasn't fair. It wasn't open. It wasn't transparent".

When, out of a hat, the Campbell forces pulled a U.S. corporation "to complete" a "fairness report" (Charles River Associates), satisfaction was not achieved. Peter Rickershauser, for BNSF, found the report unsatisfactory on many counts - one of the most obvious: Charles River Associates didn't bother to interview the bidding companies involved! Also BNSF recorded that the Gordon Campbell forces did not reveal to bidders a major term of consideration.

That last fact was spotted by the Alberta/B.C. company Ferroequus which refused even to bid because, it appears, it believed it was being misled about government requirements (in order to get lots of bidders who could be said to have "failed" in the bidding?).

A reasonable observer might conclude that the sale of BC Rail was seriously tainted because the Gordon Campbell forces were determined to misrepresent its real state, to pretend it was a huge liability, to organize civil servants, management of BC Rail, perhaps CIBC World Markets, perhaps many others to propagandize, on the basis of "cooked" information, for a sale, and then to sell it to political friends - whatever the cost to B.C.

Over and over, at the time, critics accused the Campbell forces of using accounting tricks to claim BC Rail was losing money and of setting it up, falsely, for destruction. Paul Nettleton backs up their position. On January 6, 2004, Nettleton (on radio) told an interviewer this:

"The inner working of the Campbell administration really is all about micromanagement, control over cabinet [and] caucus, with a healthy dose of intimidation. They certainly tried to intimidate me. When they failed they resorted to enticement from the highest levels in an attempt to silence me. The person they used was David Basi."

In the hand-written pages by Yvette Wells, Director of the Crown Agencies Secretariat, light shines through, revealing a group building a propaganda case for destroying BC Rail while pretending not to do so.

April 17, 2003. "Can we back up debt spiral [at BCR] with evidence?"

May 12, 2003. "shouldn't talk about purchase/sale".

May 13, 2003. "Have we made the product sound too good?"

May 17, 2003. "Some concern that there is a deal with CN - CIBC has dealt well with this not being the case. Want to ensure this is not communicated."

They didn't talk about "purchase/sale", because orders were out.

On June 6, 2003 (to the village of Pemberton) Gordon Campbell wrote of a "new partnership".

He wrote on September 3 to the Ferroequus Railway Co. of an "investment partnership with CN", and on November 25, 2003, again, of "a new BC Rail Investment Partnership". On June 8, 2004, Kevin Falcon wrote of "BC Rail's partnership with CN Rail." Examples are everywhere.

BC Rail did not enter a partnership with CN. All statements of the kind quoted may fairly be considered concerted attempts to mislead British Columbians, concerted activity involving moral breach of trust.

Messages poured in to Gordon Campbell. One: "This is not a partnership. It is a total sell-out of a Crown corporation owned by the taxpayers." Another: "I didn't realize you were a liar." One writer challenged falsifications about the solvency of BCR: "Why do you keep dodging the issue?" Yet another: "doesn't it bother you that you were elected based on a complete deception?" Anger at betrayal of trust was expressed over and over and over.

The Gordon Campbell forces charged on, obviously engaging in a betrayal of the electorate. What is more, to maintain the breach of trust the Campbell forces had to engage in heavy damage control - what Paul Nettleton called "micromanagement, control over cabinet [and] caucus, with a healthy dose of intimidation."

Many people believed (and believe) the sellout was a crime, highly organized and executed. But they couldn't get at it because the Campbell forces - many believed - controlled the law, the police, and the courts. Search as people might, they couldn't find a law, an instrument they could use to meet the activities of the Campbell forces. The Campbell forces were confident no one would.

There was - no doubt - breach of trust by public officers. That is a primary fact. As Sgt. John Ward of the RCMP was quoted as saying on December 30, 2003 just after the "raid" on the legislature, "organized crime has many, many faces".

Then something happened the Campbell forces hadn't planned for.

A 20-month investigation by Victoria police and RCMP began to move like a juggernaut. First a drug investigation, it became a commercial crime investigation, too, and then it landed in the legislature.

The investigation became so hydra-headed RCMP gave it the name "every-which-way". A key contact point in the legislature was, apparently, wire-taps on the telephone used by Dave Basi, powerful aide to the Gary Collins, Minister of Finance.

And, then, on December 28, 2003, search warrants were put in action to "raid" offices of the B.C. legislature, many homes, and offices in Vancouver and on Vancouver Island. A year later Dave Basi, Bob Virk, and Aneal Basi were charged variously with counts of fraud, breach of trust, and money laundering.

On a BCTV program, December 29, 2003, Keith Baldrey recorded that "Bob Virk [is] in Transportation. Transportation is responsible for the BC Rail initiative and Finance had a larger role than most and that's again where Dave Basi comes in."

Almost all the other people visited or searched as a result of the warrants - many connected to both the Gordon Campbell and federal Liberals - have had the search warrants involving them all-but blanked out, as protection. Christie Clark, minister of education and deputy premier, was in line to have her home raided it is alleged. But it is alleged that Associate Chief Justice Patrick Dohm reasoned with police to have them telephone in advance and make an appointment to visit. Thoughtful of him.

The "something" that happened obviously galvanized the Campbell forces. The BC Rail sellout had hit what might be a network involving drug crime, breach of trust by public officers, bribery, money laundering, and perhaps much more. All of it might, perhaps surround, involve, connect to, and be part of - who knows? - the corrupt sale of BC Rail.

The BC Rail sellout had hit "crimes" that have "laws" to meet them - criminal laws. The Gordon Campbell forces couldn't stop the charges being laid, even if they wanted to, because there were so many investigators and investigations involved.

Had two kinds of organized crime, acting independently, suddenly met head-on? Or was one an arm of the larger organized crime network, suddenly trapped in dangerous waters? The Gordon Campbell forces became trapped. If the three men accused were acting under orders, one might theorize, everything had to be done to prevent trial so that cabinet members could avoid charges against them and so the government wouldn't fall.

If the three men accused were acting wholly independently - still everything had to be done to prevent trial. The digging up of evidence to defend the men would bare the sleaze and manipulation and breach of trust used by the Gordon Campbell forces to sell BC Rail corruptly. It would reveal the network of organization to produce the necessary "crimes without laws" to destroy BC Rail.

The fix appears, then, to have been in. Now, more than five years after the search warrant "raids" on B.C. legislature offices, the pre-trial hearings concerning the three accused are still limping and stumbling and faltering in the Supreme Court of B.C.

On May 7, 2007 Canadian Press released a story on the charges against the accused more or less presenting the position of the Prosecution. Putting aside the drug-related events, in "November 2003, police learned that [Dave] Basi was involved in alleged criminal matters related to the sale of Crown-owned B.C. Rail, Winteringham [lawyer for the Crown] said." [Notice Winteringham doesn't speak of an "investment partnership" but "the sale".]

"Bobby Virk, Basi's brother-in-law, who was an aide to then-transportation minister Judith Reid, is also facing fraud and breach of trust charges while Aneal Basi, another cousin, is charged with money-laundering in the B.C. Rail case."

"The Crown alleges that between May 2003 and December 2003 Basi and Virk received benefits from lobbyists at a firm called Pilothouse Public Affairs Group in exchange for providing them with confidential government documents regarding the sale of B.C. Rail."

"Pilothouse was representing OmniTRAX, an American company that was among the bidders for B.C. Rail."

In the same story Canadian Press reported that Defence counsel "has alleged that [Gary] Collins [Minister of Finance] promised OmniTRAX a 'consolation prize' to stay in the bidding to provide [for the Gordon Campbell forces] the appearance of a real bidding process", and perhaps to drive up the price of BC Rail. Defence alleges "the RCMP abruptly dropped investigating him [Collins] to focus on their clients" [Basi, Virk, and Basi].

"Winteringham said there was no consensus among police officers as to Collins's role and that various investigators had different views about whether he was even under investigation."

This member of the B.C. public who sits day after day in the B.C. Supreme Court to follow the matter, has drawn some conclusions.

(1) The BC Rail Scandal cases point to a serious break-down of democratic institutions in B.C. As we see, just for instance, Wally Oppal, Attorney General of the Province - "chief law officer of the Crown" - plays every kind of clown to keep information about the corrupt sale of BC Rail from the people of the Province. Gordon Campbell refuses even to admit questions are being asked. Someone else answers questions directed to him in the legislature.

(2) The break-down is pointed to over and over again in the pre-trial hearings.

(3) To me, the Special Crown Prosecutor has failed to advance the process, and has been a party to its delay.

(4) To me, the RCMP has delayed tediously, and then has disclosed materials requested in ways that are simply unacceptable. The RCMP has, as I see it, put almost every obstacle in the way of clean and direct reporting of investigation. The RCMP may be said - as I see their role - to have "Robert Dziekansky'd" the whole operation.

(5) To me, almost all agents serving or connected to the Gordon Campbell forces give the impression of obstructing and delaying proceedings - agents for the cabinet, the Liberal MLAs, the RCMP, and BC Rail.

(6) To me, the profound importance of the proceedings should have touched the presiding judge, Madam Justice Elizabeth Bennett. I don't think it has. Seeing the huge importance and the implications of the BC Rail Scandal, she needed to seize upon the full meaning of 'the majesty of the law'. This, after all, is the most important public trial in B.C. history.

BC Rail is a possession of all the people British Columbia that has been alienated by breach of trust. Allegedly, in part, it has been alienated, too, by criminal breach of trust and - perhaps - by many more actions of criminal breach of trust than we have been allowed to see.

The role of Madam Justice Elizabeth Bennett should have been to inform British Columbians regularly and as fully as possible about all aspects of the case. To me, she has seriously failed to do that. To me, she has seemed to use special care to keep information from British Columbians.

Her role should have been to demand of cabinet, BC Rail, RCMP - on threat of Contempt of Court - that they provide full and open and expeditious cooperation. Her role should have been to demonstrate in no uncertain terms that - even when a government is involved - the process of justice will move without hindrance. As I see the matter, she has not done that. Why not? The very kindest explanation must be, I believe, that like the Roman emperor Nero, she fiddles (with the rule book and precedent and visible delaying tactics) while justice and the social order of British Columbia burn.

Finally, to me, there is a huge irony in the BC Rail Scandal. The Gordon Campbell forces have used elaborate breaches of trust to dump BC Rail and steal it from the people of the Province. They have done the same thing, secretly, against election promises, to BC Hydro. The Gordon Campbell forces, I believe, have robbed British Columbians of billions and billions of dollars worth of assets as well as present and future wealth - without facing a single criminal accusation. Instead, the spotlight in the Supreme Courtrooms of B.C. is on three cabinet aides who - amidst the flood of dishonesty the Province has been swimming in - are accused of benefiting to the tune of some tens of thousands of dollars.

What better indication can there be of the collapse of a just social order? Three men (whatever their guilt or innocence) are, I believe, being used as sacrificial goats behind whom masters of chicanery, manipulation, greed, and violation of trust posture as guardians of The Good. And they use - it seems to me - all the institutions devoted to the safety and security of the population to help them in their venal activities.

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

 

Victoria Law Courts Room 101 today, Aneal Basi ...

.
File #145212-1 - Aneal Basi.

Count 001 - CCC 253a - care or control vehicle/vessel while impaired
Count 002 - CCC 253b - care or control of vehicle/vessel with over .08

Victoria Law Courts, Room 101,
Friday March 20 2009 at 9:30 AM,
Counsel: J.M. Doyle.

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
The information (below) was posted today on a February 22, 2009 page where readers might miss seeing it. So I am re-posting the information here, exactly as received. - BC Mary.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


"EM" wrote:

It is more clear today that Anneal Basi (Mar. 20 posting of Mary) is charged with impaired.
re "I don't know a thing about the private lives of Basi or Virk although I will add here that I encountered an odd listing of Aneal Basi, File #145212-1 in the Feb 17, 2009 Victoria Provincial Court Listings (Completed)."

Time is getting closer to the Supreme Court of Canada case. Things seem to be moving along. SCC Case Information Docket 32719
Appeal hearing scheduled, 2009-04-22
factum information is sealed, but you can see the progress of the case, note the sealing of a in camera meeting. Feb 11/09
Decision on motion to seal, De, Tab 1 of Volume II of the Appellant’s Record (marked Sealed) filed January 26, 2009, containing the in camera hearing transcript, be kept under seal;
The Appellant’s Factum (marked Sealed) filed on January 26, 2009, and any Factum of the Respondent on Cross-Appeal which may be filed by the Appellant, containing quotes from and argument referring to the in camera hearing transcript, be kept under seal;

http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/information/cms-sgd/dock-regi-eng.asp?32719

I wonder if this will be Broadcasted
-----some more "stuff"
Check the lobbyist Registry lately?

Ken Dobell 2009-FEB-16
Subject Matter Capital Project End: 2009-JUL-16
Global Container Terminals Inc.
Ck on Global Container Term. and I found mind you it is 2007. "Accomplished transportation industry exec chairs GCT Global Container Terminals Inc. board of directors

TORONTO (February 20, 2007): Paul M. Tellier, former Chief Executive Officer of Canadian National Railway and Bombardier Inc., has been appointed Chairman of the Board of GCT Global Container Terminals Inc., an Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan private investment company
and
Jiles,Mark Consultant Lobbyist
Lobbyist Organization: Macquarie North America Inc.
2008-SEP-01 End: 2009-FEB-19

Subject Matter To promote P3's and the Gateway Project links available
... As the post about container freight it blows my mind that all the same players of BC Rail are playing front and center in todays Hot topics ... I just hope some of this info is helpful.

EM
# posted by Anonymous Anonymous : March 20, 2009

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

 

Robin Mathews reports on HMTQ v. Limited Access File #134750-1: today March 18, 2009, 2:00 PM, Room 53

.
VANCOUVER LAW COURTS
Public Access Supreme Court Criminal List
Date: March 18, 2009

File #134750 Victoria Law Courts
Location of offence: Victoria, B.C.

- Count 005 Person dealing with government offering bribe
- Count 006 Offer bribe to official for exercise of influence
- Count 007 Breach of trust by public officer
- Count 008 Offering bribe to government official

- Count 005 Person dealing with government offering bribe
- Count 006 Offer bribe to official for exercise of influence
- Count 007 Breach of trust by public officer
- Count 008 Offering bribe to government official

Room 53, Vancouver Law Courts
800 Smyth Street. March 18, 2009 at 2:00 PM.
Confirmed in today's court listings.

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

COURTROOM 53, AFTERNOON OF MARCH 18, 2009
Robin Mathews


Lawyers, like pigeons at Granville Island, circled and landed until there were close to twenty in Courtroom 53. Then a judge appeared - Madam Justice Humphries. The only BC Rail Scandal lawyer I spotted was Andrea MacKay, acting for the Crown in the matter of concern today.

This was a session to establish court dates and pre-trial dates for a number of accused. And so they were called, accommodated, and left - nine or ten of them (and the lawyers involved).

Then the ALR matter and the accusations against Duncan, Young, and (Dave) Basi were dealt with. Dave Basi has been committed to trial (in Victoria), and Ms. MacKay for the Crown requested and received consent for Thursday, March 26 at 2:00 p.m. to have all three accused together in Vancouver court.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""


Tuesday, March 17, 2009

 

When deals are inked behind closed doors ... and the results affect the public interest ... how does the public get to know?

.


This morning's news reported two disparate events with a certain similarity. Both claim to be about relationships. Both of them announce agreements for serious future activities. Both agreements are far-reaching in their effects on British Columbia. Both come under the jurisdiction of a small group of people, which means that both groups came to their decisions behind closed doors, not necessarily known to the wider population.

One is a new freight concept. One is a new First Nations concept.

I have set them together for comparison. Frankly, I'm uneasy with both of them. On the issue of First Nations government, I've taken only a snippet from a learned friend's argument (below). As for this wonderful new transportation deal that's been "inked" (stupid term), I can't help thinking that British Columbia should have held its key position within that cargo network to the rest of the continent. BC Rail represented British Columbia interests; it was a plus, not a minus. I mean, if the Halifax Gateway Council, a non-profit organization, can function to the benefit of Halifax, then the publicly-owned BC Rail could have done the same for us. I think we were double-crossed from within, a long time ago. - BC Mary.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Halifax inks deal to strengthen cargo ties with southern US

HALIFAX, N.S. -- Officials from Halifax and Memphis, Tenn. have signed an agreement to work together to pursue stronger, mutually beneficial cargo links. Halifax was represented by Stephen Dempsey, chair of the Halifax Gateway Council, while Arnold Perl, chairman of the Memphis Regional Logistics Council signed on behalf of Memphis. The agreement was also endorsed by the mayor of each city.


“This partnership is about building relationships, but the agreement also means we need to be ready sell the Gateway business case” Dempsey said.


“Memphis is literally connected by CN rail to both coasts of Canada through Prince Rupert, B.C. on the West and Halifax, Nova Scotia on the East – these trading relationships will only enhance our competitive positioning,” Perl said.


Tom Ruth, president and CEO of the Halifax International Airport Authority stated, “Memphis has 100 million-plus square feet of warehouse space. It is the largest air cargo hub in North America and is home to the air cargo giant FedEx – a key customer at the Halifax Stanfield International Airport. Our key strategic relationship with Memphis will benefit our Gateway in many ways.”


The Halifax Gateway Council (HGC) is a not for profit organization with a mandate to work collaboratively to increase growth in air cargo, air passengers, port cargo, and cruise passengers. The Memphis Regional Logistics Council was formed by the Greater Memphis Chamber to strengthen and grow the existing logistics business through a regional approach which includes West Tennessee, East Arkansas and North Mississippi.

__________________________________________________

B.C. plan may start new era of aboriginal government

Updated Sat. Mar. 7 2009
The Canadian Press

VICTORIA -- The provincial government is looking to redraw the aboriginal map of British Columbia -- a move that one expert believes could usher in a modern new era of aboriginal government.


The proposed changes are part of a sweeping reconciliation legislation that would amalgamate First Nations, reducing their official number from more than 200 to less than 25. Despite some jitters, many First Nations are embracing the changes, taking strength from the promise that any changes to their current governing structure will be aboriginal driven and not imposed by government.

Member of the First Nations Summit voted last week to support the proposed B.C. government legislation, which will also recognize the long-standing title rights aboriginals have as the historic first inhabitants of the province.


"People have to ask questions because I don't want to be forced into working with First Nations that we might not get along with or it doesn't make a natural fit," said Chief Judith Sayers of the Hupacasath First Nation located near Port Alberni on Vancouver Island. The Hupacasath First Nation has 265 members, but they do not want their current political powers diminished by a provincial government worn out from negotiating land, water and resource rights with 203 different First Nations, she said.

"We heard the B.C. minister of aboriginal relations and reconciliation say that it is up to the First Nations to determine what their political structure is going to be -- and it might well be 203 First Nations or it might be 30 or it might be 100. We just don't know how that's logically going to play out," Sayers said. "There are some things that we just need to sit down and talk about."

Mike de Jong, B.C. aboriginal relations minister, said the First Nations consistently tell the government the current structure that created 203 First Nations was imposed upon them by federal and provincial governments.
Aboriginal groups have been examining a draft copy of the proposed B.C. legislation. The draft contains a map with 23 aboriginal nations spread out across the province.

"The reconstitution of Indigenous Nations and its identification of proper title and rights holders are keys to achieving certainty and the effective functioning of the framework for shared decision making and revenue and benefit sharing contemplated by this Act," says the draft. Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, one of the B.C. aboriginal leaders negotiating the recognition proposals with the government, said aboriginals are ready to consider a new governing structure.

B.C. aboriginals have been examining the recognition and governance issue for months at meeting across the province, he said. "The legislation and the concept underlying the legislation allow for First Nations to make those determinations themselves," Phillip said. "It's not something that will be imposed on First Nations or groups of First Nations." Prof. Cole Harris, an expert in aboriginal history at the University of British Columbia, said B.C.

First Nations appear ready to embrace a process that allows them to preserve their political values, while interacting more closely with non-aboriginal society without giving up their rights.
"If this is real serious co-management, and if native people are going to have a major voice, it's a large step," he said. "The question is just how real the native voice is going to be."

___________________________________________________

Quote from Mickleburgh's article in the G&M:

"There was also some aboriginal opposition to another proposition in the bill, approved by the government and the First Nations Leadership Council, that would whittle the 200 or so existing native bands down to what native leaders call "the original 30 indigenous governments."


The voice of a citizen is heard in private correspondence:

What friggin' ROT. There was no such thing as a common Haida government, a common Nuu-chah-nulth government, a common Kwakwaka'wakw government, a common Secwepemc government, a common Carrier government, a common Tshilhqot'in government, a common Stl'atl'imx government, a common Sto:lo government, a common Cowichan govenrment ...

... what's happening here is basically that the British claim that survived American attempts to seize the whole region, is being swept aside and handed over to the alleged "30 original indigenous governments" which never existed. And whichever native leader claimed that all of the province belonged to some native people or other is very, very wrong; some areas like the deep Coast Mountains none of them had ever been to, ditto in vast areas of the north; the Secwepemc didn't DARE to go in the upper Columbia, above Revelstoke, because the Blackfeet hung out there; in the north the Beaver and Sekani hid from the woodland Cree, the Lower Lillooet didn't go to Harrison Lake because of the danger from the Chehalis and the Southern Kwakiutl (who, until Fort Langley came along, raided the Lower Fraser right up to Yale with some regularity and almost no opposition, likewise the Haida).

[Permission to quote from private correspondence has been requested. - BC Mary.]

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Monday, March 16, 2009

 

Absolutely unbelievable: Olympics will require major rescheduling of criminal trials?

.

Police attending to security needs during the 2010 Winter Games means a major rescheduling of criminal court cases will be needed.

By Jeff Nagel -
Surrey North Delta Leader - March 16, 2009

Click on the headline for the full story:
B.C.'s court system is in for an Olympic-sized challenge next year.

Many police officers won't be on hand to testify as witnesses in criminal trials for up to 10 weeks in early 2010 because they'll be needed for security during the Winter Olympics.

The police absence from the courts means at minimum a major rescheduling of criminal court cases is needed and has spawned fears some suspects may walk free because of the expected backlog to the system ...

{Snip} ...

Integrated Security Unit Supt. Kevin deBruyckere said exactly which and how many officers are designated for Games security should be known by next fall, allowing court proceedings to go ahead with officers that aren't needed.

"This time has got to be made up somewhere," he said. "There may be a temptation on the part of government to not proceed with a number of charges." [Kevin DeBRUYCKERE. RCMP. One of the lead RCMP investigators in Project Everywhichway (the police raid on the BC Legislature), who is also by coincidence the brother-in-law of B.C. Liberal Party executive director Kelly Reichert.

DeBruyckere disclosed that information to his superiors in March 2004, but defence lawyers have strongly argued that his relationship is a conflict of interest that should have had him removed from the case, but have not at any point alleged any impropriety on the part of either DeBruyckere or Reichert. From Bill Tieleman's Encyclopedia of the Basi Virk Case. - BC Mary]


jnagel@surreyleader.com

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Sunday, March 15, 2009

 

Campbell aides in new controversy ... again.

.
An old news story ... all new again. From June 5, 2008:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Campbell aides in new controversy

.
"The inner circle" is an understood reference to political players in the governing style of Premier Gordon Campbell. Michael Smyth, while providing an inside look at that powerful group last year, gave us information on Patrick Kinsella gives a new clarity to last week's news. Full story is HERE. - BC Mary.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


SENIOR LIBERAL AIDES IN NEW CONTROVERSY

Michael Smyth,
The Province: June 05, 2008


Another day, another lobbying controversy to rock Premier Gordon Campbell and his government.

Last time, it was Campbell's right-hand-man, Ken Dobell, getting rung up on a guilty plea for secretly lobbying Campbell on behalf of the city of Vancouver. (Dobell is the only lobbyist I know who actually had a desk in the premier's office!)

{Snip} ...

Patrick Kinsella was the co-chair of the B.C. Liberal election campaign in 2001 and 2005. Mark Jiles was Campbell's personal campaign manager in Vancouver-Point Grey in 2005.

Now the two men are in business together at the Progressive Group, a powerful government-relations company in Vancouver. And according to documents newly released by our neighbours in Washington state, they're doing very well for themselves.

Kinsella and Jiles have been paid by the state government to help the Americans cash in on our Olympic Games by boosting cross-border tourism and business deals. They had to supply the state with a detailed resume, obtained by hard-digging Internet blogger Sean Holman under Washington's freedom-of-information law.

It turns out the duo's long list of clients include companies that have cleaned up with huge government deals and contracts in British Columbia: Accenture (which landed a $1.45-billion privatization contract with B.C. Hydro), Alcan (which won B.C. approval for an expanded smelter and power deal), the B.C. Motion Picture Production Industry Association (which scooped $65 million in government tax breaks) and many others.

The resume unashamedly brags about Kinsella's and Jiles' ties to B.C. politicians and their parties.

The resume says the pair have "strong relationships" with B.C. cabinet ministers Colin Hansen, Kevin Falcon and Olga Illich and with federal cabinet minister David Emerson.

The resume details a glowing list of accomplishments over the past six years. It notes, for example, the motion picture association hired the Progressive Group "to convince the provincial government to extend foreign tax credits" to the organization. Companies such as Alcan and Accenture hired them to "promote and educate" the B.C. government on behalf of their clients. [Remembered: David McLean. Use the SEARCH box at top left of this page; type in the name of David McLean, CN boss at the time of the BC Rail deal, to read more about him. -BC Mary]

Just one problem with all of this: Just like Dobell, Kinsella and Jiles did not publicly register as lobbyists working in B.C.

Under the law, lobbyists must register and publicly disclose their activities. Failure to do so can bring a fine of $25,000.

Kinsella has never registered as a lobbyist. Jiles registered on behalf of several clients beginning in December but did not register for any of the clients listed on the resume.

Kinsella and Jiles did not return my phone calls yesterday. But NDP Leader Carole James said she will launch formal complaints about their activities with both the provincial and federal lobbyist registrars.

"You'd think the premier would have learned by now," she said. {Snip} ...

They clearly get the concept of power, however: It's an insiders' game.

msmyth@direct.ca

http://www.canada.com/theprovince/news/story.html?id=4b44e6e1-dbef-4e04-9d83-7c9d2e626313

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

There's interesting stuff in the archives of this web-site. I went to "June 2008" to search for the Bill Tieleman and Sean Holman reports on the same Kinsella topic (without finding) and before I knew it, an hour had gone by.

What was so interesting? Well, for one thing, I came across a lengthy background story about the lives of Dave Basi and Bobby Virk, written by Kim Bolan ... definitely, a must-read. And other stuff. See for yourself. OK? - BC Mary.


""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

 

Things British Columbia needs to know

.

North Van's Grumps has left a new comment ... [to access the hyperlinks, please go to N.V.G.'s comment on the Robin Mathews report below. - BC Mary]

[N.V.G. provides this URL as "the greatest way to access the Provincial Library" ... http://www.llbc.leg.bc.ca/databases/checklist/ ]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

November 25th, 2003 was when the BC Liberal government made the announcement that CN Rail had won the bid to take over BC Rail... but on November 20th, 2003 the union representing the workers of BC Rail had published their document which is still available at the BC Legislative Library, AND the links have been published here on BC Mary's blog already.

The library still holds the leaked document in its establishment dated May 2003, and here's the good part.... its not exactly like the BC Liberals can crow over the way the City of Vancouver managed to keep track, lost track, no pun intended, of their In-Camera documents just before their municipal election because the leaked document that CIBC was holding in trust for the BC Liberals had the same sort of layout on the cover stating: "COPY #______", was blank, the audit trail of possibly tracing who's document it was, is not known.

For all three documents at one spot: Just ask your local Librarian via the internet.


Posted by North Van's Grumps to The Legislature Raids at March 14, 2009

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
North Van's Grumps has provided a step-up for those who search for the inside story of how BC Rail, the publicly-owned railway, was selected, packaged, and offered up for sale. He sent this information as a comment. I thought it should be posted in a more prominent space and I hope that others who check into these documents, via N.V.G.'s hyperlinks, will come back to this spot with fresh comments of their own. Very special thanks to N.V.G. for this public service. - BC Mary.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Another important comment received this morning, from "EM" ...


I dont know where to place this Mary, but regarding FIPPA, curious this announcement and the timing (link below )

"BC gov't sows fear by claiming 'crown copyright' on released documents, say critics
February 24th, 2009 12:00am
.
Congratulations! The B.C. government -- the one that promised to be "the most open, accountable and democratic government in Canada" -- has just granted your freedom of information request.

You open the package of documents and find a notice that seems to say you can't make the information public without the government's permission.

"Permission of the copyright holder" -- that would be the B.C. government -- "must be obtained prior to any reproduction, dissemination or sale of these records (including the posting of such records on the Internet). If you wish to reproduce a record or portion of a record that is subject to Crown copyright, you must send a copyright request to the Province's Intellectual Property Program."

Huh?
In the eyes of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Association, this notice is both intimidating and legally questionable. About a year ago, FIPA and researcher Stanley Tromp filed a complaint with B.C.'s information and privacy commissioner.
link to teh above
@ http://fipa.bc.ca/home/news/206
--------------
EM

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
One of the links provided by EM is "Stonewalling Freedom", an excellent protest against this very thing, written by Stanley Tromp, of the Association of Canadian Journalists. It's available HERE.

I would very much like to hear from readers, with their responses to what EM has encountered. Thanks, EM. - BC Mary.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Further insight into what Patrick Kinsella is, and does, in those troubled times. See Jonathan Fowlie column HERE.

Fuss over BC Rail contract puts a spotlight on Kinsella
Times Colonist - Victoria,British Columbia,Canada

... matter was before the courts in the case related to the controversial sale of BC Rail's freight operations in 2003, which is in pretrial proceedings. ...

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Friday, March 13, 2009

 

Robin Mathews: Friday morning in Courtroom 66 - Basi Virk pre-trial hearing.

.
Friday the 13th of March 2009 in BC Supreme Court, Vancouver

Mostly a quiet morning happened, with explosive implications. On the surface all was philosophical. Underneath the air was tense with conflict and frustration... as will become clear.

The day opened with seven counsel in court and one person in the gallery. It remained that way except for a few flurries of students. They arrived to taste The Noble Institution That Supports Our Living And Breathing And Robust Democracy.

This report will demonstrate the truth of those capitalized words.

Mr Frank Falzon continued his argument regarding the absolute sanctity of the legislature and its ineradicable privilege which the courts may not lift or interfere with. Nothing can change that, he averred, not even the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Mr. Falszon's clients are the Speaker of the House, the Conflict Commissioner, and the Clerk. His argument, which seemed to dwell on a high, philosophical plain may have had other more soiled purposes.

Madam Justice Elizabeth Bennett worked, it appeared, to find a way by which the Defence could get access to materials (produced by MLAs) - Falzon claims - under absolute lock-up because of infrangible parliamentary privilege. She was fully present, seeking to understand argument and to work to find ways to secure the needs of Defence - bringing up the wonderful 'break-through' concept of "innocence at risk' - a legal concept that thrusts aside many barriers to release of evidence if it may be claimed a person or persons will be called guilty when evidence to prove them innocent exists but is withheld.

All was appearance today. Reality, alas, dwells, perhaps, at a deeper level. Her efforts are commendable - on the level of appearances.

Justice Bennett was, indeed, the one, the other day, to raise the matter of newspaper reports of the NDP's discovery that Patrick Kinsella (high-profile Liberal) was paid close to $300,000.00 in the employ of BC Rail between August 2001 and September 2005. Uncharacteristically, she referred to a news item in the print media as court opened on that day. I erred in my last report, believing she became engaged, later, when Kevin McCullough for the Defence brought up an e-mail between two top BC Rail officers questioning a large payment to Kinsella. More will be said about that e-mail, I understand, as pre-trial court argument proceeds.

The battle which ensued over the Kinsella post blew into such a storm around the legislature and the tattering reputation of Attorney General Wally Oppal that the Corporation issued a note yesterday to admit Kinsella was employed in those years by BC Rail "to provide strategic advice to our new President, Board of Directors and Chair" No one will doubt, I am sure, that Patrick Kinsella possessed in those years far greater expertise in railway operation than any of the people he was hired to advise. If anyone has any doubts, his salary of $6000.00 per month will erase them.

After Mr. Falzon completed his argument, Joseph Doyle, for the Defence, embarked on his presentation. His argument struck at the absolute claim and suggested, moreover, that the Conflict of Interest Commissioner has many documents that don't fall into Falzon's categories. He argued, further, that gifts which are recorded as received by cabinet members might well set a pattern for gifts received by their employees - getting at the argument that the accused were showered with uniquely conferred "gifts".

Calling upon common sense which often mirrors the Common Law, he explained that "privilege" grew up to prevent all kinds of interference with the independence of legislators. But, he insisted, the privilege must be reasonable and relate. We know there is no privilege that shields legislators from criminal action, and so Mr. Falzon's arguments don't hold.

Mr. Doyle was to continue his argument for the rest of the day.

Something in the air - as I have suggested - conveyed a sense that we were watching a surface performance, the meaning of which lay below the surface. At one point Defence Counsel Kevin McCullough rose to point out that days and days and days have been spent on solicitor/client privilege, litigation privilege, third party privilege, and...and...and now parliamentary privilege. Madam Justice Bennett waved her arm as if to say, perhaps, she didn't want to hear that, or to say that Destiny must play itself out.

Except Destiny has many faces. The argument over the kinds of privilege the RCMP could claim was exhausting. None of it - NONE OF IT - was necessary. NONE OF what is going on today is necessary.

And this is where we must see that the day was - almost certainly - given up to make-believe, to choreographed delay, to the calisthenics of robots, to what I believe is a plan to undermine the very integrity of the courts. I wrote a note to myself during the morning events. It reads: "the extraordinary fact is that defence of men accused of criminal actions is peeling away the legitimacy of those who are (in fact) preferring the charges".

"No. No." you say. "All that activity cannot be sham, cannot be choreographed beforehand."

Early in the investigation (back in 2003) Gordon Campbell said that every assistance would be given. Plainly, he did not mean what he said. For if he and Gary Bass, top RCMP officer in B.C., had issued clear instructions that REAL cooperation must take place, all the nonsense about privilege, almost all the fabricated delay in disclosure would have been erased. Why should the RCMP wish to keep investigative information from Defence? Why should Gordon Campbell and Liberal MLAs want to prevent Defence from knowing what they were doing and saying through the time of the sellout of BC Rail and the accusations against Basi, Virk, and Basi? Why would Gordon Campbell wish BC Rail Corporation to hide its communications during the time of the sellout?

Anyone familiar with criminal trials knows that almost always the Crown gathers evidence it believes Defence will need. The Crown genuinely assists with disclosure so that trial may be fair, competent, timely. The Crown, sure of its case usually, has no fear that Defence will surprise knowledge into the light that throws the Crown's whole purpose out the window - and if, in the rarest of cases, that does happen, the Crown is easy because it doesn't want to engage in illegitimate convictions.

But in this case, I believe it is reasonable to say that the Crown, the RCMP, the cabinet, and BC Rail, through almost all their agents, have worked against providing the materials that could make a trial happen with fairness, efficiency, and timeliness. Think about that.

Think about courtroom 66 today where, if I am correct, a theatrical presentation is taking place - which intends to supplant reality with fantasy and to convince British Columbians that the fantasy world of Gordon Campbell must be the real world in which all of the rest of us dwell.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

 

Basi-Virk: Yes, Friday the 13th in BCSC

.
File #23299 -- R. vs. Limited Disclosure
Vancouver Law Courts
800 Smyth Street
today, Friday March 13, 2009 at 10:00 AM.
Application for records.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Is the rumour true, that the A.L.R. bribery pre-trial proceedings for R. v. Udhe Singh Basi ongoing in Victoria are more interesting than the biggie unrolling in Vancouver? Anybody know? Big Media seems to have been immunized from reporting even as much as the dates for each courtroom event. Public is free to attend, so far as I understand it, but nobody is free to publish details of the proceedings until (again, so far as I understand things) ... until the biggie in Vancouver is completed, for fear of unfair advantages (or something like that). Not sure where the public advantage is fitting into all these events.

- BC Mary.


""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Well done, Vancouver Sun! They did indeed print up a few of the need-to-know details of this story. The full story is HERE.

Basi breach of trust case in court April 1


CANWEST NEWS SERVICE
MARCH 13, 2009


Former provincial government aide David Basi will make a first appearance in B.C. Supreme Court in Victoria April 1, charged with breach of trust in connection with the removal of Sooke farmland from the Agricultural Land Reserve.

Judge Ernie Quantz committed Basi to trial after a preliminary hearing wrapped up Thursday [March 12]. Defence lawyer Michael Bolton said it was not known when a trial date will be set as Basi is already in pretrial proceedings in Vancouver on charges of breach of trust for allegedly leaking confidential information about the BC Rail sale process.

The Victoria case alleges that Tony Young and Jim Duncan of Sunriver Estates, also known as Shamrock Hills Development Corp., paid Basi $50,000 to help grease the wheels for a 700-home development.

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Thursday, March 12, 2009

 

Robin Mathews: Courtroom 66. Morning, March 11, 09

.

There was 'big news' this morning - which sent reporters scurrying. And - in the short term - it was big news. In the last days the NDP released information that nearly $300,000.00 was paid to Gordon Campbell friend, Patrick Kinsella - to his firm, Progressive Group - between 2002 and 2005. For what work?

That's the question which Wally Oppal, answering for the premier (as if Gordon Campbell is too retarded to speak for himself) persistently and ridiculously refused to answer. To show the empty posturing of a government with less and less credibility, Oppal persistently claimed he would not answer the question because it arose from the Basi, Virk, and Basi process in court - even though it was discovered in a report by BC Rail shelved in the legislature library.

If someone were to ask Wally Oppal what he thinks about tomorrow's weather, he'd refuse to answer on the claim that the weather will be the same for the Basi, Virk, and Basi court process, and so the question is clearly connected to the 'trial'. Oppal's paper thin credibility grows thinner with each passing hour.

The Kinsella 'big news' surfaced in court because Defence lawyer Kevin McCullough raised the matter, reporting Defence is in possession of an e-mail between top people in BC Rail asking why there was a major payment to Patrick Kinsella. Was he a lobbyist?

There has been no indication in any documents to date from BC Rail that they had a lobbyist. What would a lobbyist do for BC Rail - which was being 'sold' (out) by the Gordon Campbell government? (We know Madam Justice Elizabeth Bennett chose to rule the FOI-gathered documents from BC Rail could not be given to the NDP and the public. Clearly, BC Rail is holding some high explosives. And just as clearly, Madam Justice Bennett, under the claim of privilege, is denying them to the British Columbia public.

More will be said about this matter - much more...

The day began on the question of parliamentary privilege, based on the application by Defence to get materials exchanged among MLAs regarding the sale of BC Rail and the accusations against Defence clients.

That, too, is big news, - although of a more rarefied kind. For the rights of legislators in Canadian democracy are strong, and the courts must walk carefully around them. Counsel Frank Falzon argued that parliamentary privilege is absolute and cannot be lifted by a court. Joseph Doyle, for the Defence, had already taken the position that there are exceptions that can be invoked. Since parliamentary privilege is a key aspect of our constitutional life, and since it was fought for over centuries to prevent kings and others from challenging the legitimacy of legislators - and sweeping them aside - its discussion in today's courtroom strikes a note of historical relevance and interest.

But there is a poisonous present aspect to the discussion in Vancouver court today. (I will write much more about that.) The poisonous aspect is that what is really on trial in the Basi, Virk, and Basi matter - something that becomes clearer with each passing day - is the Gordon Campbell government and (what I see more and more as) its on-going breach-of-trust-without-law-to-confront-it. That is why Wally Oppal is slithering like a caught cobra - because the Basi, Virk, and Basi process probably cannot ever be tried in full and open court without the whole Gordon Campbell operation being exposed in a way that will make Canadian history.

At present, Basi, Virk, and Basi is in pre-trial hearings where much more may be hidden from public view that can be hidden in full trial. Another reason, hallway talk has it, why the Gordon Campbell forces are doing everything in their power to prevent the matter coming to trial. If hallway talk has solid base, the question then is just who are the people who make up the Gordon Campbell forces?

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Can't resist: "Hey, Mr Oppal: how's the weather?" - BC Mary, in appreciation for a good joke when we see one. And for clarifying the heavy sledding, too. Thanks, Robin.

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

 

BC Rail pays Liberal Insider

.

B.C. Rail paid Liberal insider

A-G Wally Oppal cites court case in refusing to discuss payment

Patrick Kinsella, a friend of Premier Gordon Campbell and one of the most powerful stringpullers in the B.C. Liberal party, has made a killing on government contracts since guiding his pals to power in 2001.

{Snip} ...

"He [Kinsella] wrote the platform for the governing party that said it wouldn't privatize B.C. Rail and then he got the best of both worlds," said NDP MLA Rob Fleming.

"In 2002, he started getting on the payroll and made 300 grand — presumably to advise on exactly how to privatize B.C. Rail!"

{Snip} ...

Read Michael Smyth's full story here.

_________________________________________________________

QUERY RAISED ABOUT WHAT KINSELLA DID FOR BC RAIL
The Globe and Mail - 12 March 2009

Full story is here.


_________________________________________________________

KINSELLA LOBBYING MATTER RAISED BY JUDGE (and Defence) IN BASI-VIRK CASE
Neal Hall
Vancouver Sun - March 12, 2009

Read the story HERE.

__________________________________________________________

STONEWALLY TO THE FORE AS NDP POUNDS KINSELLA CONNECTION
Vaughn Palmer
Vancouver Sun - March 12, 2009

Read the column HERE.

__________________________________________________________

'BACKROOM LIBERAL' KINSELLA PULLED INTO BC RAIL CASE
Andrew MacLeod
The Tyee - March 12, 2009

Read the story HERE.

____________________________________________________

 

#3. Heartland bill

From: eddie mazur [mailto:joypeace@shaw.ca]
Sent: March-11-09 6:20 AM
To: weststar@telus.net
Subject: BC Rail "Heartland" Buck

Good morning Bill,
I have attached a copy of my Heartland $3 bill that I produced back in 2003 when I was a member of the "Stop the Sale of BC Rail" committee here in Prince George. It is good to see that finally the truth is coming out on this corrupt dishonest giveaway of the taxpayers asset BC Rail by Gordon Campbell's liberal government.

I am sending it to you so that it could be used in some way to get out the truth on this government. Let me know if you could use it and or where I could send it, so it can be useful. I have sent it in PDF and in word. Thanks for the great work you are doing on this very important case. Thanks Edward Mazur
__________________________________________________________

I tried and tried to post the photos, but can't do it. I'm on my way to hospital. Ask Bill Tieleman to show you the $3. bill. - BC Mary

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

 

Patrick Kinsella and the BC Rail sell-off

.
HANSARD Blues - Wednesday, March 11, 2009 afternoon


ROLE OF PATRICK KINSELLA IN B.C. RAIL SALE

L. Krog [MLA for Nanaimo, Opposition critic for Attorney-General]: Yesterday, if the Premier wasn't already aware of it, he was made aware that his friend Patrick Kinsella and his companies — the former co-chair of two Liberal campaigns — received $297,000 of taxpayers' money from B.C. Rail. My question to the Premier is quite simple. What services did Mr. Kinsella and his companies provide for $297,000?


Hon. W. Oppal [BC Attorney-General]
: Obviously, this matter arises out of those issues that are now before the Supreme Court in the B.C. Rail dispute. In the circumstances, I'm not going to comment on it ...

L. Krog: I want to remind the member for Point Grey that he's not just an ordinary member of this assembly. He's the Premier of Her Majesty's government. He is the leader of the B.C. Liberal Party. And he promised…. [major uproar deleted - BC Mary]

L. Krog: And he promised that he would have the most open and transparent government in British Columbia ever.

My question is to the Premier. He has been asked. He's had a day to find out. It is his duty. Tell this House today: what did his friend Mr. Kinsella do for $297,000?

Hon. W. Oppal: If that member has any evidence of wrongdoing, he should take it to the….

Interjections.

Mr. Speaker: Members. Members.

Hon. W. Oppal: He should take it to the appropriate authorities.

J. Horgan: My question is to the Premier, who ran in the 2001 election claiming to want to preside over the most open and transparent and honest government in North America. I'm wanting to know….

Interjections.

J. Horgan: Wow. Wow. Too much pixie dust. Too much pixie dust. I wanted….

Interjections.

Mr. Speaker: Just take your seat.

J. Horgan: I wanted….

Mr. Speaker: No, Member.

Interjections.

Mr. Speaker: Members. Members. Member for Victoria-Hillside, withdraw that remark unequivocally, please.

R. Fleming: I will withdraw the remark, and my heckle should have said that the B.C. Liberals…

Mr. Speaker: Member.

R. Fleming: …betrayed their promise on B.C. Rail.

Mr. Speaker: Member. Continue, Member.

J. Horgan: My question is a simple one to the Premier of the most so-called open government in British Columbia's history. How can it be that a close personal friend and campaign manager can get $300,000 from the government of B.C. and we're not allowed to know what he did? Can the Premier please explain to me, my constituents, everyone in this place how it's possible that it's none of our damn business? ...

Hon. W. Oppal: Right now there's a trial proceeding in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, and in the circumstances, it would be improper for anyone in this House to comment on any matter that arises either directly or indirectly from that trial.

J. Horgan: Audited financial statements from a Crown agency — formerly a Crown agency — B.C. Rail: proceeds to Progressive Holdings, the Progressive Group — $297,000.

This is not before the courts, to the best of my knowledge. Mr. Kinsella, to the best of our knowledge, is not before the courts. This document was tabled in this Legislature. Will the Premier tell us why his pal got $300,000? Did he write a memo? Did he send an e-mail? Did he say that everything was fine? Is the train running on time? What the heck did he do?

Hon. W. Oppal: My answer is the same. The question is the same.

M. Farnworth: Well, the Attorney General won't answer, in part because he wasn't here. He stated a few moments ago that people should ask the appropriate authorities. Well, guess what. The Premier was here. The Premier is the appropriate authority, and won't answer, in part because he wasn't here, and he stated a few moments ago that people should ask the appropriate authorities.

Well, guess what. The Premier was here. The Premier is the appropriate authority, and he knows the answer as to why Patrick Kinsella was given a $300,000 untendered contract. So our question is very simple. To the Premier: why was Mr. Patrick Kinsella given a $300,000 contract? What did he do for that $300,000, and why won't you tell this House and the public of British Columbia what he got that money for? ...

It's a very legitimate question to be asking the government, now that it's exposed, to provide details on what he was hired by B.C. Rail to do, because he wrote the platform for the governing party that said it wouldn't privatize B.C. Rail, and then he got the best of both worlds. He came in, in 2002, started getting on the payroll and made 300 grand, presumably to advise on exactly how to privatize B.C. Rail.

So tell the taxpayers of British Columbia exactly what Mr. Kinsella was on the payroll to do and what he was paid for.

Hon. W. Oppal: There are people who are before the Supreme Court, charged with some serious offences, and when comments of that sort are made, we take every chance here of jeopardizing a right to a fair trial ...

S. Herbert: Well, on this matter, I heard the Minister of Transportation say: "Oh, well, that document is public." You're damn right it's public, and that's why we demand an answer. ...

Hon. W. Oppal: Let me give that member a bit of a lesson on separation of powers. ... Our system operates under principles of independence. The Legislature is separate and independent from the executive. The executive is independent from the judiciary. Each body does not intervene or comment upon the activities of another body. That's what the principle of independence means.

While that member obviously doesn't appreciate these long-hallowed principles, I want to remind him that any comments that we make here can have unfair repercussions on the fairness of the trial process. ... "It is essential to the rule of law that the integrity of the judicial process not be interfered with. High-profile prosecutions have failed in the past because politicians felt compelled to make comments in public that were later deemed prejudicial." That's the member for Nanaimo.

[End of question period.]

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Interjections have been mostly removed and readers who go to the Hansard record may agree that today's Question Period "was not an Answer Period" and that the government rules were fulfilled: "if you have nothing more to say, ATTACK." Ijits. Please note the strange remark by Wally Oppal: "
we take every chance here of jeopardizing a right to a fair trial." Did he really mean that? - BC Mary.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

 

North to Alaska: BC Rail as you may never have thought of it before. "A great longterm project, it'll change the face of the world!"

.

BC Rail In Depth Report
North to Alaska
Patrick Brown
Island Tides - November 28, 2004

When CN bought BC Rail from the provincial government, they not only achieved a monopoly on rail freight traffic for most of the interior of British Columbia, but also sewed up the two major route possibilities for a future railroad to Alaska. Given CN's ambitions for a railroad empire spanning all the North American Free Trade area, did they pay enough?

The CN purchase was announced on November 25, 2003 and completed on June14, 2004. On December 17, 2003, the BC Government released the final version of the Fairness Report," written by the consulting firm Charles River Associates (CRA) of Boston, Massachusetts ...

{Snip} ...

Alaska Bound?

There are presently two railways in Alaska: the narrow-gauge White Pass and Yukon, from Skagway to Whitehorse, and the Alaska Railway, from Fairbanks to Anchorage.

CRA's report made no mention of possible future Alaska links, despite the fact that the idea (first floated in 1860, see box) has recently achieved significant momentum, as shown in the following quotes and events.

On December 11, 2000, US President Bill Clinton had signed the Rails to Resources Act of 2000. "The President is authorized and urged to enter into an agreement with the Government of Canada to establish an independent joint commission to study the feasibility and advisability of linking the rail system in Alaska to the nearest appropriate point on the North American continental rail system.

"There is authorized to be appropriated to any fund established for use by the Commission as described in subsection (a)(1) $6million to remain available until expended."

A Transport Canada "Issues Paper of 16 Mar 2001 stated: "The US Congress has allotted $6million to establish a bilateral commission to study the 2000 km rail link from Fort St John BC to Fairbanks Alaska ... The Yukon Government supports the rail project and [Alaska Senator] has met with Minister Collenette to discuss the project.

The paper projected a link from the Alaska Railway near Fairbanks to Prince George or to Fort St James on BC Rail's Dease Lake extension ...


Read more. Read how Prime Minister Paul Martin agreed to provide Canadian funding for the joint study. But how all those future business prospects were omitted from the CRA's assessment of BCRail's worth. Patrick Brown concludes with: "Thus, CN's purchase of BC Rail's freight operations, and its perpetual lease on the BC Railway Company's railbed to Fort Nelson and Dease Lake, effectively block all other railways' access to Alaska. This strategic advantage does not appear to have been valued adequately in CRA's analysis. Read Patrick Brown's full report with route map here.


Reprint from Volume 16 Number 22 Nov 18, 2004

© Island Tides Publishing Ltd.This article may be reproduced with this attribution, in its entirety, with noti¥cation to Island Tides Publishing Ltd. This article was published (November 18, 2004) in Island Tides. Island Tides is an independent, regional newspaper distributing 17,500 print copies throughout the Gulf Islands and the Canadian Strait of Georgia from Victoria to Campbell River to Howe Sound.
Island Tides, Box 55, Pender Island, BC, Canada. Phone: 250-629-3660. Fax: 250-629-3838.
Email: islandtides@islandtides.com. Website: http://www.islandtides.com

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

 

Dave Basi in Victoria Provincial Court today, March 11, 2:00 PM, re A.L.R. Thanks em.

.

Checked Vict. adult court list Prov. and Udhe S Basi is in Court @ 2pm March 11th.
http://www.ag.gov.bc.ca/courts/court-lists/lists/Victoria_Law_Courts-Provincial_Court_List.pdf

121 1 a ii
CCC 121 1 c
CCC 121 1 d

Breach of trust by
public officer
Accepting bribe as a
government official
Accepting bribe from
person dealing with
gov't
Offering to influence
government official
pg 3-23

Hope you start feeling better Mary
em
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

 

Bill Tieleman:

.
It has been good to watch Bill Tieleman in recent days, as he brings out story after story on the topics which BC media love to avoid. This one in "Straight Goods.ca" has a national readership, a good thing for the the 8,000 pages of heretofore secret documents, some of which have had a national angle right from the get-go.

Liberals get message out at all costs

Confidential documents show Libs spent $19 million on advertising before the election.

Straight Goods - March 10, 2009

by Bill Tieleman

I can tell you this: We are going to end government feel-good advertising. People don't want to see us use their money for that. — Gordon Campbell, November 2000

Confidential BC government documents show that "key messages" for $19 million in provincial advertising run before the May 2005 election included highly partisan attacks on the opposition New Democratic Party.

And another newly released document outlines government communications plans to "maximize convention attendance and membership renewals" for the BC Liberal Party.

Details of the taxpayer-funded "Best Place On Earth" ad campaign were attached to a document titled "Advertising — Key Messages" that directly references the "NDP" three times and complains about the media not communicating government messages.


Taxpayer-funded ads attacked the previous NDP government ...

includes a line reading: "Party to develop summer program aimed at using ministers, political staff to maximize convention attendance and membership renewals" and a page titled "Defining the Opposition" with explicit attacks on the NDP. ...

Read Bill's full column here.

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""


Tuesday, March 10, 2009

 

Patrick Kinsella's $300,000. to smooth the way for the sell-off of BC Rail

.
Debates of the B.C. Legislative Assembly
5th Session, 38th Parliament
Hansard blues draft transcript
Tuesday March 10, 2009 - PM

See March 11 News Release from Official Opposition (below)


ROLE OF PATRICK KINSELLA IN B.C. RAIL SALE

L. Krog [Opposition critic for the Attorney-General]: Can the Premier confirm that his friend Patrick Kinsella, the chair of the 2001 and 2005 B.C. Liberal campaigns, received an untendered contract from B.C. Rail in 2002 to smooth the way for the sell-off of B.C. Rail?

Hon. W. Oppal:[Attorney-General]: The member well knows that the issue relating to B.C. Rail is before the Supreme Court of British Columbia, and we will not comment on the matter.

L. Krog: Perhaps the Attorney General and the Premier didn't hear what I had to say. The documents aren't before the courts. They're, in fact, available up there in the Legislative Library. If the Attorney General or the Premier has some knowledge about them and something that indicates that this matter is before the courts, perhaps they'd care to tell the House here today.

B.C. Rail's audited financial statements show $297,000 in payments to Mr. Kinsella over the period of the B.C. Rail privatization scheme. Patrick Kinsella's specialty is working the back rooms. My question is to the Premier. Who was Patrick Kinsella lobbying on behalf of the government during the sale of B.C. Rail? It wasn't the federal government. It wasn't the municipal government. Will the Premier tell us: who was Mr. Kinsella paid to talk to, and what did he tell them?

Hon. W. Oppal: You know, I don't know if this member realizes it or not, but there are people who are on trial before the Supreme Court of British Columbia right now.
Interjections ...

Hon. W. Oppal: Irresponsible comments of that sort jeopardize a fair trial, and that member well realizes that by commenting in this arena about the trial that's before the Supreme Court jeopardizes the right to a fair trial.

R. Fleming: Very simply, we're asking questions about items that aren't in evidence. They're in the parliamentary library just down the hall from here. We're asking questions about a secret, untendered contract worth $300,000, awarded to the Premier's friend Mr. Patrick Kinsella to help sell B.C. Rail. A secret untendered contract to the author of the Premier's 2001 election platform that, you'll recall, promised not to sell B.C. Rail.

Don't the people of British Columbia deserve to know the truth about this payment — a payment that broke the rules and has been kept secret for six years? My question is to the Premier. Who did Mr. Kinsella lobby in this regard? What did he tell them? Tell us what Mr. Kinsella's role was in the B.C. Rail sell-off.

Hon. W. Oppal: The fact that the documents are now available in the public library, in the library here in the Legislature, is irrelevant. The fact is they were before the courts. They were secured as a result of being in the courts. You know, I'm quite prepared…
Interjections.

Hon. W. Oppal: …to give the members opposite lectures on the doctrine of separation of powers, but in the meantime, I'm not going to comment on anything that's before the Supreme Court or has been before the Supreme Court or has been connected to the trial that's before the Supreme Court.

R. Fleming: These filings — the evidence of this contract that is in the parliamentary library — is because the Financial Administration Act was violated. This is information that should have been available to the public for six years, since those contracts were awarded, and they never were, by B.C. Rail online or in any other source.

Here's what we know now. The government broke the rules to give the campaign chair of this party — the governing party — and their chief fundraiser a $300,000 contract to help smooth the B.C. Rail privatization.

Just what did this key Liberal official know? He's known for his lobbying and not calling it lobbying. What did he do for his money? That's the question today to the Premier. Will he tell British Columbians the truth? Will he tell why his government paid Mr. Patrick Kinsella $300,000 to help sell off B.C. Rail?

Hon. W. Oppal: The fact that the documents are now available is not relevant. The fact is they have been in evidence.

Interjections.

Hon. W. Oppal: The documents relating to B.C. Rail have been the subject of a decision by Madam Justice Bennett of the Supreme Court of British Columbia.

J. Horgan: Well, let me help the Attorney out. I know he's always keen to solicit my advice. The financial statements for B.C. Rail, a Crown entity, tell us, the legislators of this place, that the chief bagman for the Premier and his political party received an untendered contract for $300,000. What did he do for the $300,000? That, surely, is not before the courts.

Hon. W. Oppal: The fact is all of this matter is related to what's before the Supreme Court. The subject of the B.C. Rail….

Interjections.

Hon. W. Oppal: The B.C. Rail litigation is before the Supreme Court of British Columbia. The fact is all of this matter is related to what's before the Supreme Court. The subject of the B.C. Rail litigation is before the Supreme Court of British Columbia, and I'm not going to comment on it.

J. Horgan: Well, we do know something about Mr. Kinsella's expertise. In his own resume to the state of Washington, he suggests that he has experience with a company called Accenture by providing inroads to the government to privatize half or one-third of B.C. Hydro. He has experience with Alcan, another company familiar to the Premier and his colleagues, who received a pretty sweet deal for electricity purchase and power sales during the tenure of this government. So that's Mr. Kinsella's expertise.

Why would B.C. Rail, who are identified in the platform of the current government as not for sale…. Why would B.C. Rail pay this guy 300 grand? What is the deal with that? Why is that not appropriate questioning in the Legislature of British Columbia?

Hon. W. Oppal: I'll repeat my answer. The issues relating to B.C. Rail are very much before the Supreme Court of British Columbia, and we're not going to comment on that.

M. Farnworth: The Attorney General stands here in this House and says he's prepared to lecture, you know, on before the courts. Well, one thing he's still going to get, no matter how many lectures he does, is a failing grade on openness and accountability on this issue.

These documents were not before the courts. They're in the Legislative Library, they've always been in the Legislative Library, and they have not been before the courts. My question to the Premier is: what was Mr. Kinsella doing for $300,000? Stand and answer that question. Why was he paid $300,000?

Hon. W. Oppal: The issue of accountability and alleged wrongdoings relating to all documents, whether they are before the court now, whether they have been released for the court, are all linked to B.C. Rail. All of those matters are before the Supreme Court of British Columbia.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

MEDIA RELEASE by BC Official Opposition
For Immediate Release
Mar. 11, 2009


CAMPBELL GOVERNMENT SUGGESTS LIBERAL INSIDER CONNECTED TO B.C. RAIL CORRUPTION TRIAL

VICTORIA – Attorney General Wally Oppal added a new twist to the B.C. Rail corruption scandal when he refused to answer questions about a contract awarded to B.C. Liberal insider Patrick Kinsella, arguing that the issue is part of the ongoing trial at the B.C. Supreme Court.

B.C. Rail financial statements show the crown corporation paid Kinsella almost $300,000 between 2002 and 2005. When New Democrat MLAs raised questions about the contract in Question Period on Tuesday, Oppal refused to respond, saying “The fact is all of this matter is related to what's before the Supreme Court.”

New Democrat Attorney General critic Leonard Krog asked Gordon Campbell to explain what duties Kinsella performed for the contract, but the premier refused to answer the question and Oppal continued to claim the matter was before the courts.

“These financial statements are a matter of public record. Is the Campbell government saying the contract with Mr. Kinsella is part of the ongoing court case? If so, it would be the first time the Campbell Liberals suggested their top campaign organizer is part of the B.C. Rail corruption trial,” said Krog.

Kinsella co-chaired the 2001 and 2005 B.C. Liberal election campaigns ...


From: http://bcndpcaucus.ca

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Video link from Sean Holman's site, Public Eye Online, HERE. :


"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

 

Michael Smyth writes in The Province today: Sale of BC Rail a tale that needs to be told

.

History of Liberals' manouevres should come out in court




Followers of the sordid B.C. Rail saga may point to Dec. 28, 2003 — the day of the infamous police raid on the legislature — as the date of the long-running scandal's genesis.

In fact, as the recent release of 8,000 pages of previously secret documents in the case reveals, this is a tangled web that stretches back even longer in time.

The paper trail detailing the government's obsession with selling B.C. Rail to private-sector competitor CN Rail goes all the way back to 2001, the year Gordon Campbell was first elected premier, partly on a promise not to sell the Crown-owned railroad ...

While all this was going on, the documents show Campbell continued to spin his "not-for-sale" line — even to B.C. Rail employees.

"I assure you that the government is not looking at the privatization of B.C. Rail as part of our transportation strategy," the premier wrote to a B.C. Rail worker in 2002.

...

The case was back in court again yesterday, with the defence pressing for the release of even more government documents. This time, a lawyer for Campbell's Liberal caucus was present.

Why? Because now the defence wants all cellphone and e-mail records pertaining to the B.C. Rail deal from 17 Liberal backbenchers, mainly from rail-dependent northern ridings. The government, as usual, is fighting to keep the documents secret.

...

Now British Columbians deserve a trial — and the whole truth.


Read the full story here.

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Good column, Michael. Many thanks! - BC Mary.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Monday, March 09, 2009

 

Expert: Street-level drug dealing and violence are only symptoms of organized crime activity that should be of far greater concern

.
Target criminal fronts: expert

Cleaning up Calgary's downtown streets also means keeping a close eye on what's happening in the office towers, says an international expert on organized crime ...

"If we continue to fight organized crime on the street level, we will never dismantle these criminal groups." ...

In his 2001 bestselling book, Bloodlines, Antonio Nicaso documented how a prominent Mafia family in central Canada considered buying properties in Calgary and Banff.

"I believe sophisticated crime groups have tried to enter legitimate businesses to capitalize on Alberta's booming economy. . . . If they're coming here looking for business, they're not talking to the Hells Angels."

To infiltrate the legitimate economy, organized criminals need accomplices who can conceal dirty money in legal processes like real estate deals and other financial transactions, Nicaso said ....

Read the full story here:

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""


 

Basi Virk in Vancouver Supreme Court today, March 9, 2009, at 10:00 AM

.
Sorry for the confusion ...

There IS a pre-trial hearing today in Vancouver Supreme Court for Basi, Virk, Basi starting at 10:00 AM. So it's important to confirm these things -- the difficulty being that confirmation is only possible by checking the court listings after 9:30 AM on the actual day of the sitting. It doesn't leave interested members of the public with a lot of leeway to get to 800 Smyth Street.

So ... news bulletin!! ... there is ... IS ... a court listing for Basi, Virk, Basi, File #23299, for today ... that's TODAY ... March 9, 2009 at ... it says ... 10:00 AM. Confirmed.

I'm still puzzling my way through today's Victoria Court Listings ... that being where I thought Dave Basi's hearing would be occurring, in the A.L.R. case. On March 11.

Sigh ...

- BC Mary.
___________________________________________________________________________

Saturday, March 07, 2009

 

Broe to Campbell, Aug 15, 2002 :“I want to meet with you again ... the province will be best served if BC Rail freight service was privatized."

.
BUSINESS

New documents reveal complaints about fairness before BC Rail sale announced

BY NEAL HALL
VANCOUVER SUN - MARCH 6, 2009


Newly disclosed government documents from the Basi-Virk corruption trial reveal that the B.C. Liberal cabinet decided Oct. 1, 2003 that CN Rail was the winning bidder of the $1-billion privatization sale of BC Rail.

The controversial decision wasn’t made public until 55 days later, on Nov. 25, 2003.

But before then, other bidders were already upset about the fairness of the process, the documents reveal.

One of the new documents is a letter sent Jan. 14, 2002, from OmniTrax chief executive Gary Rennick to then-transport minister Judith Reid, indicating OmniTrax, one of the U.S. bidders, had been discussing the privatization of BC Rail with the government since 2001.

{Snip} ...

Among the new documents is an email to the premier’s office from Brian Kieran, a lobbyist representing OmniTrax.

Kieran was trying to set up a dinner meeting in May 2002 with Premier Gordon Campbell and Patrick Broe, the owner of OmniTrax, who wanted to continue discussions about BC Rail with the premier.

“The Charles River report was a whitewash,” Krog charged Friday, pointing out that new documents reveal emails from Charles River staff to government, seeking “feedback” on a draft of the fairness report.

Many of the newly released documents detail the government”s communications strategy, including tips to define the opposition NDP as “not a credible option for government” and its leader “not up to the job as premier.”


Read the full story here.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

 

BC Rail: Northern BC took the full brunt of the fall-out from losing BC Rail to CN. Here's a rare glimpse of what that's been like ...

.
Rail service

cfvua
The Tyee - March 6, 2009


... others may not be familiar with how much more it costs now in the Northeast to do business, since the giveaway of BC Rail.

We now have essentially no service and in the case of trailer on flat car (TOFC) no service at all. This service allowed trailers to be loaded onto the train in Vancouver (2 per rail car) and allowed delivery of them with a simple truck tractor. No need for gargantuan container handlers or the rock solid yard they need to operate.

The equipment was sold by CN and went to Australia, a country with large distances to cover with sparse population (go figure).

One real reason that BC Rail couldn't make a profit was due to other railroads and phony interlining agreements, which would not allow BC Rail to access their networks or which pay the originating carrier the largest portion of the tarriff (good for BCR, bad for the others).

BC Rail was essentially boxed in to BC. I have a hard time believing that this wasn't a set up to make the BC Rail fail or at least appear to lose money so we could give it away. All that needed to be done was a serious environmental review of the others and they would most likely have seen the benefit in leaving BCR alone.

CN would not repair bridges that would allow shipping to the east from Dawson Creek to Grande Prairie and beyond thereby adding a 500 km detour to Prince George, then Edmonton. Thank CN for putting countless truckloads of lumber on the roads and adding to shipping costs for local mills especially in the Peace.

CN only repaired and fixed up the track after political pressure was applied (it was part of the deal) and are making a point by never having put a train on that stretch of track.

When you ask for that service, you are told it is not available. I am told that BC rail tried to purchase the line from CN, but they wouldn't sell it. Now we get to pay more to build Wind Energy, Oil and gas projects and even the groceries and booze that used to come on the rail now cost more and also add to overall emissions and highway congestion.

It saddens me to think that I at one time supported these folks. The only business that means anything to these people is big business. Small business can be sacrificed. The only thing these folks might understand is a good public flogging at election time.

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

This comment by a Citizen Journalist was posted on The Tyee, following Railgate Bombshell by Bill Tieleman, published March 3, 2009. I have invited "cfvua" to join us here, and I hope he/she will tell us exactly where this is happening. For the moment, it's enough to know that it's happening "somewhere in north-eastern B.C." ...

Sincere thanks to "cfvua" and The Tyee for this: - BC Mary.

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

 

Basi Virk: FROM STAUNCH DENIAL TO TALKS WITH BIDDERS ...

.

CAMPBELL STILL HAUNTED BY BC RAIL DEAL

Documents released this week by a judge in a political corruption trial trace the government's route from staunch denial to talks with bidders and then a media strategy on how to sell privatization to the public

VANCOUVER -- When Gordon Campbell swept to office in 2001 with a stunning victory that gave him all but two seats in the provincial legislature, his Liberal Party had a clear mandate to remake British Columbia just about any way it wanted.

And it didn't take the Premier long to start making big changes, as he announced a 25-per-cent tax cut on his first day in office, dramatically underlining his message that B.C. was "open for business."

Privatization of Crown assets and a revitalization of B.C.'s aging transportation system were both high on Mr. Campbell's action agenda, and within months he was thinking about selling BC Rail. But offloading the iconic, debt-ridden railway owned by the province since 1918 would prove to be one of the most troubling deals his government has ever made.

Thousands of pages of partly censored internal documents were released last week by the Supreme Court of British Columbia in response to an NDP motion in a political corruption trial involving Dave Basi and Bobby Virk, former ministerial aides charged with fraud, breach of trust and accepting bribes in relation to the sale of BC Rail. The documents are shedding new light on how the government strategized on the controversial $1-billion deal, which continues to haunt Mr. Campbell even as he seeks a third term in the May 12 vote.

Within months of taking office, Mr. Campbell was being advised that a key part of his transportation plan should be selling BC Rail. "Let the market drive public policy, for so goes the economy of the province," states one internal government note that, like many of them, has the sender's identity blanked out.

By fall the government had a task force examining privatization opportunities, and by the following spring a note urges Mr. Campbell to sell BC Rail quickly.

"The BCR Group of Companies is a $1-billion dollar public asset, that is currently losing 10 per cent per year or more, due to changing times. As a crown corporation it has peaked, stalled and rolled over the top onto a downhill slide. ... Now is the time, to maximize the corporate return from the BCR Group of Companies, to reduce the deficit!" it states.

The files do not reveal Mr. Campbell's response. But throughout 2002, he repeated his "New Era" campaign promise not to sell BC Rail.

In an Aug. 19, 2002, e-mail to a BC Rail employee, name blanked out, Mr. Campbell couldn't state it more clearly: "I assure you that the government is not looking at the privatization of BC Rail as part of our transportation strategy."

By that fall, however, Mr. Campbell was meeting with officials from other railways, including Matthew Rose, president of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp., which would later become a bidder along with another U.S. company, OmniTRAX.

And while publicly denying BC Rail was for sale, the government began secretly preparing to announce the deal. A file marked "confidential" shows that by November, 2002, the government had a media plan drafted.

"The communications strategy presented in this document has been prepared to provide guidance for planning and implementing an announcement regarding a decision to sell the industrial freight division of BC Rail," it says.

It notes the "New Era campaign promise 'not to sell or privatize BC Rail' " will cause problems, but tells ministers to focus on the demand of BC Rail customers for better service, and on the "serious financial risk to BC taxpayers" posed by the railway's $639-million debt.

It says supporters should be lined up in advance.

"The key spokesperson(s) will be media trained prior to the announcement using key messages and master Q & A document. ... In advance of the announcement a select group of customers and supporters will be provided with relevant factual information and messages to support the sale announcement and respond to media enquiries," it states.

And the strategy sought to have officials "make calls to select business media" to help guide coverage. "The decision to sell would be positioned in terms of a response to overwhelming evidence against retaining the freight railway in government hands," it says.

After issuing a request for proposals for BC Rail's freight division, in May, 2003, the government studied bids from CN, CP and a combined offer from OmniTRAX-Burlington Northern Santa Fe.

The files include minutes that show Mr. Virk, the ministerial aide who would later be charged with accepting bribes for allegedly leaking information in exchange for money and gifts, was involved with the committee evaluating the bids.

"Virk to work with [deputy minister Chris] Trumpy and the Office of the Premier to finalize letters of invitation ...Virk to confirm with [Transportation] Minister [Judith] Reid the relationship between BC Rail, the Northern Transportation Strategy discussed at the fall session. ...Virk to ensure Minister Reid confirms outcome," state various entries.

On Nov. 25, 2003, the government announced a deal that gave CN the right to operate on BC Rail's roadbed under a 60-year lease renewable for up to 990 years.

But behind the scenes it hadn't gone smoothly. CP and the U.S. bidders complained because CN alone had been given an opportunity to meet with BC Rail shippers, gaining valuable knowledge about rates that other bidders didn't have.

"Our dismay arises because of the lack of fairness in which the process has been conducted so far, the apparent favoritism of certain bidders, and the lack of timely information," Peter Rickershauser, vice-president of Burlington Northern, wrote on Nov. 18.

CP raised similar concerns a week earlier - and dropped out of the bidding.

But while the complaints were unsettling to the government, which insisted it had run a fair process, far worse was to come.

On Dec. 28, 2003, police raided the legislature and hauled away files from the offices of Mr. Basi, who was a ministerial aide to then-finance-minister Gary Collins, and Mr. Virk, an aide to Ms. Reid.

The government didn't let the raids stop the BC Rail deal, which closed in July, 2004, but a second privatization offer, for a BC Rail port subdivision at Robert's Bank, was cancelled when police told officials confidential information had been leaked.

The joint case against Mr. Basi and Mr. Virk remains in pretrial hearings. Many more documents are expected to emerge at trial.

What's in the files

The information contained in the 8,000 pages of documents includes:

Heavily edited cabinet minutes where even the subject headings are blanked out.

Media strategies that call for reporters to be "hand picked" for inside scoops and the presentation of groomed "supporters" to validate the government's message.

A 2003 letter to Martyn Brown, then Premier Gordon Campbell's chief of staff, that contains a job application from Bobby Virk, saying he was referred by Mr. Campbell and Lara Dauphinee, the executive assistant to the Premier.

An audit that shows op-ed pieces submitted by Mr. Campbell, and run by many newspapers including The Globe and Mail, "have been written for the Premier by IGRS [Intergovernmental Relations Secretariat]."

Heavily redacted correspondence tracking notes from Mr. Campbell's office that contain heads such as "RCMP raid on the Legislature" and "Basi/Virk cases rel'd to BC Rail partnership." Notes indicate material was blanked out under various sections of the Privacy Act.

Documents online

The New Democratic Party posted on the Web yesterday digital copies of thousands of pages of internal government documents released recently by the Supreme Court of British Columbia. The NDP got access to the material by filing a motion for material that defence lawyers in a political corruption trial had earlier obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. The documents are related to the $1-billion sale of BC Rail by the government in 2003. "These documents shed some light on the B.C. Rail corruption scandal, and the public deserves to have access to this information," NDP attorney-general critic Leonard Krog said in releasing the material.

The documents are posted at:

http://www.bcndpcaucus.ca/en/bcrailcorruption

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""


It has always been difficult to "snip" paragraphs (to avoid copyright infringement) from Mark Hume's reports, because he packs each line with solid information in a smooth-flowing narrative. This March 7, 2009 column -- at such a critical time in B.C. history -- is especially valuable. So I am hoping that Mark Hume and The Globe and Mail will forgive me for posting the column in its entirety. I hope they will see it as a sign of respect for its value to the public. It is reprinted here, with appreciation. - BC Mary.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20090307.BCBASI07/TPStory/National

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Friday, March 06, 2009

 

NOT CONFIRMED: Today in Victoria Supreme Court: Dave Basi

.
See March 6, 2009 court listings to confirm.

NO LISTING FOR DAVE BASI, FILE #134750-1-D, APPEARS IN TODAY'S ONLINE COURT SCHEDULES. Not in Vancouver Supreme Court, not in Victoria Supreme Court.

CORRECTION: THANKS TO NORTH VAN'S GRUMPS, who found the listing on Page 7 of VICTORIA PROVINCIAL COURT LISTINGS for March 6, 2009.


Dave Basi is facing four fraud-related charges of taking $50,000 from developers to help a 700-home project at Sooke, near Victoria.

NVG sent us this:

1 Adult Court Lists http://www.ag.gov.bc.ca/courts/court-lists/

2 Adult Court Lists (Provincial) select Victoria Law Courts

3 Victoria Law Courts-1201
Public Access Adult Court List
Room: 101 Court Date: 06-MAR-2009 http://www.ag.gov.bc.ca/courts/court-lists/lists/Victoria_Law_Courts-Provincial_Court_List.pdf

4 Control F search for "Basi"

5 Basi is on page 7 of 33 1 134750-1-D BASI, Udhe S. (. etc........


""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Thursday, March 05, 2009

 

If CanWest had been doing its job, maybe BC wouldn't be in this mess. Note the important Media Advisory added March 6 ...

.

It started off OK ... remember that full front page of Vancouver Sun completely taken up by those 27 Questions, perfectly reflecting the frightened thoughts of British Columbians whose Legislature had just been taken over by police?

For a while, things were as they should be, with BC's flagship newspaper giving voice and quite a bit of printer's ink to major concerns, such as "Was organized crime operating within the BC Legislature?". Then, within a year, any mention of the historic raid had almost stopped.

What happened? What went wrong? Why were British Columbians -- so uniquely dependent upon CanWest for almost all news -- left in the dark? Or worse: told that 30 uniformed police sergeants hauling files out of their Legislature was nothing to worry about?

Two examples:

1) Les Leyne's column on March 3, 2009 in Times Colonist says it all in its title: "BC Rail Case buried in political trivia." Political trivia, eh? Yeah, sure. "Nuthin' to see here, folks, just keep movin' along please ...." Thanks a lot, CanWest.

2) The Jasmohan Singh Bains trial, about which CanWest published nothing for 6 months. Then an astute citizen overheard a remark about it during a Basi Virk hearing (Dec. 2008). He looked around the Supreme Courtroom, saw no media, and decided to tell BC Mary.

Frankly, I couldn't believe it. It took me 2 days to verify the story ... scarcely believing my own eyes when I found it was true: the Bains trial had taken place in Victoria in June 2008 ... just down the street from the Times Colonist newspaper office. And not a word had been published in 6 months. Nothing.

Why do I think that's significant? Very, very significant? Because:

* it was Jasmohan Singh Bains and others, who police were investigating when they raided the BC Legislature.

* it was while police listened to wiretap conversations between Bains and Dave Basi that they heard of BC Rail hanky-panky.

* Bains, at the time, was thought to be Mr Big of Drugs Trafficking on the West Coast.

That's why.

And that is one hell of a lot: Especially now in the first third of the new year when shootings and killings in the Lower Mainland are a regular, almost daily occurrence. And when B.C. is being linked to the huge drug cartels causing Mexico's apparent meltdown.

You think maybe the people of B C are concerned? You think maybe they expect their media to make an attempt at covering more than the self-serving news releases of police forces (police which are clearly out of their depth)? You think people haven't noticed elsewhere that "Gang violence in B.C. is linked to Mexico drug wars"?

Well ... I broke the Bains story on Dec. 11, 2008. Not CanWest. BC Mary broke "Mr Big's" story right here on The Legislature Raids. My headline read: JASMOHAN SINGH BAINS SENTENCED TO 9 YEARS and I fully expected Google to pick that up, and that the wider public would be informed. Ha! Apparently that's not how it works in B.C. anymore.


Two more Bains-less months passed by quietly. Plenty of street chaos, nothing about Mr Big.

Quietly - except on the streets of the Lower Mainland and the suburban expanses of the Fraser Valley. There the silence continued to be broken by the wail of sirens and the chatter of small arms fire. [Tell me something: do we honestly imagine that criminals don't know the Bains story? and that they don't high-five and rejoice in their apparent immunity?]

Then something I said to Ian Mulgrew caught his attention. He promptly wrote a column headlined: "Drug dealer linked to legislature raid imprisoned" and gave me credit as his source.

God knows how Mulgrew -- calling the trial "a key victory against a cocaine ring" -- got his column past all the roadblocks and into print, because it hadn't happened before and it has never happened since. To this day, nobody mentions it in CanWest print. But I'm pleased that many other, small news media have reprinted the story.

We'll hear more about Bains during the Basi Virk Basi / BC Rail trial. The thing is: we'll probably have to be there in the courtroom to hear it, or we'll have to read about it on these blogs. That is, unless a new owner is publishing The Vancouver Sun, The Province, or Times Colonist.

So ... doesn't this explain why CanWest news media is facing such a drastic financial crisis right now? Isn't it proof that they can't fool all of the people, all of the time? And that maybe they should stop telling people that 8,000 pages of confidential government documents (which they obviously hadn't read yet) are trivial.

Let no one forget that all 8,000 of those secret government documents are available now, at only a five minute walk from Sun and Province headquarters ... but not one serious story (not even a ensible word!) has been published by CanWest.

Time for CanWest to notice that people are mad as hell and they aren't going to take this kind of "news" any longer. CanWest has been part of the problem in B.C. Now it's time for a genuine news service to become part of the solution.

- BC Mary and friends.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

SOMETHING TO WATCH FOR:
A Media Advisory from the Loyal Opposition!



Keep an eye on CanWest today, March 6, and for the next day or two ... see if they make any mention whatever of what Leonard Krog is doing.

Today, at an Open House in Vancouver, Krog had the 15 binders of secret government documents organized and available for media viewing and photocopying.

Research staff were on hand, photocopies were prepared on the spot -- or even in advance if requests were phoned in -- and Krog was there in the afternoon to answer questions relating to the 8,000 pages obtained by Defence lawyers as Freedom of Information requests.

“... These documents shed some light on the B.C. Rail corruption scandal, and the public deserves to have access to this information,” New Democrat Attorney General critic Leonard Krog said.

The New Democrats have now digitised the documents and posted them at http://www.bcndpcaucus.ca/en/bcrailcorruption.



A hyperlink will also be functioning later this afternoon which posts all of the 8000 pages - including Yvette Wells "little black book" which was included in the NDP media packages today (around 200 pages) WWW.BCNDPCAUCUS.CA/EN/09FOI


Leonard Krog is Opposition critic for the Attorney General's department.

I think the BC Opposition has provided an absolutely marvelous public service. Civilized, well-planned, helpful to media but not pushy, and sensitive to the public's need to know.

Now ... will Big Media stand up and do their duty? Will CanWest follow through with reports for the public? Probably not. But ...

Tip o'the ol' Tuque for Krog and the Loyal Opposition, eh. Well done, all! - BC Mary.

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Wednesday, March 04, 2009

 

Robin Mathews: 8,000 pages

.
On Looking Into the Binders Released through FOI to Defence in the Basi, Virk, and Basi Matter: the BC Rail Scandal.


There is so much to be suspicious of with the Gordon Campbell government - where do we start?

Prosecutors (in the Wally Oppal, Attorney General, line of command?) ruled out criminal charges against the police officers involved in Robert Dziekanski's death- probably flying in the face of what 90% of observing British Columbians believe should have happened.

(Isn't the film being played over and over at the Braidwood Inquiry what the law calls prima facie evidence - evidence that convinces you "on its face" that charges should be laid?)

And the Polish embassy suggests "B.C.'s Ministry of the Attorney General has not been cooperating in providing information of interest to Poland." (Globe and Mail March 2 09 A5) Surprise.

As Gary Mason quietly says, in addition, (Globe) March 3, "it is clear that if it were not for [the] video, the version of events supplied by the officers wouldn't come close to what actually happened". Is Mason suggesting the video catches them out in in a rehearsed fabrication of events? And if that could be true, what would Gary Bass, top RCMP officer in B.C., have to do with it? What would Wally Oppal have to do with it? Gordon Campbell?

Public Inquiries under the Gordon Campbell government are usually forms of whitewash. Will that be the case with Braidwood? Stay tuned. Stay suspicious.

It is so bad - the odour of the Campbell government - that suspicion about the relation between the RCMP and the Campbellites leaks into everything. It flows into the BC Rail Scandal, and the extraordinary separation between the three men accused - all cabinet employees - and the people for whom they were working. Before the (search warrant) raids on legislature offices and other homes and offices in Vancouver and Victoria were scarcely over, RCMP announced - displaying brilliant foresight and even prophecy - that no elected person was (or would be) investigated.

Then, later, Dave Basi was accused (four fraud-related charges) of taking $50,000 from developers to help a 700 home project near Victoria proceed even though much of the land was protected from development by the Agricultural Land Commission. Gordon Campbell is quoted as saying that no current provincial staff, political staff, elected officials, nobody at the Agricultural Land Commission has been involved in this.

The accused - not a member of the Agricultural Land Commission - must, allegedly, single-handedly removed the protection from development of the land, it would seem. A wonderful feat. Single-handed.

What has all that to do with a visit to the binders released to the Defence under Freedom of Information and containing matter deemed relevant to the charges against Basi, Virk, and Basi?

Whispers in corridors say of those documents: "there is no smoking gun". Surprise, again. "Whispers in corridors ask: "Are all the relevant documents really there?"

Maybe there is a smoking gun, but maybe it's more like a vapour trail. To begin, around the time of the so-called "bidding" for BC Rail, documents were produced aplenty - documents that declared the bidding process was fake, in effect. Documents that came as close to expressing anger as possible.

I think many ordinary Canadians would say the allegations of soiled competition were so strong the whole bidding process should have been stopped. But it wasn't. And it is at that point the vapour trail may become clear.

There appears to have been a determination on the part of Gordon Campbell to "sell" BC Rail come hell or high water - and to sell it to CNR.

Forgotten by many people is the fact that Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway (BNSF) was an early involved company to raise alarm flags. It wasn't bidding, but it was supporting and consulting for OmniTRAX - which was in the bidding. Interestingly, when BNSF withdrew, giving reasons, OmniTRAX did not. Later, it was involved in allegations about the proposed sale of the Roberts Bank spur line, a sale that was cancelled because of suspicions of contamination in the process.

In an exchange of letters (beginning on November 17, 2003) by J. Rickerhauser of BNSF and Allan Wallace, Managing Director of CIBC World Markets (for the Gordon Campbell cabinet), BNSF claimed there were "serious questions of ethics and fairness" in the bidding. It said it was "extremely dismayed with the handling of the BC Rail Transaction". It complained of "the apparent favouritism of certain bidders", and wrote of a "breach", And it said that the chosen proponent (CN) was given confidential interline rate and interline business information involving BNSF customer and business flows.

When a Fairness Report was produced by Charles River Associates, BNSF was not impressed, thought the report was very flawed, drawing into question the veracity and objectivity of that report. BNSF wrote of "blatant favouritism" (given to CN).

At nearly the same time, CPR withdrew, too, on much the same grounds. The involved people complaining asserted that word was out of special treatment for CN, widely spoken of. On November 17, 2003, Marcilla Szel ,CPR vice president of Strategy and Law, wrote to Ken Dobell, deputy minister to the premier and cabinet secretary. Ms. Szel wrote of "a clear breach of general process fairness and a violation of the intent of the specific process established and communicated by the Evaluation Committee." CPR was recorded as publicly declaring the bidding tainted when it withdrew.

Gordon Campbell drove on with the privatization - which would eventuate, after the "raids" on B.C. legislature offices (just a month later), in charges of fraud and breach of trust involving cabinet aides, the BC Rail Scandal, and apparent bribery to do with bidding and potential sales involved in the BC Rail dealing.

At the time of the BC Rail Scandal the Canadian Poster Boy for Privatization was Paul Tellier, CEO of CNR. It was a time when the corporate wonder-boys were merging and leveraging and privatizing and generally preparing for the Crash we are presently in. Tellier was Brian Mulroney's Clerk of Privy Council, present during the Free Trade deal. He became CEO of CNR in 1992 and in 1995 extracted it from Canadian ownership, privatized it, sold shares and delivered it to a majority of U.S. shareholders and to a real headquarters in Texas.

To Tellier, that was a grand victory, making it a truly North American corporation. For his successful sell-out of a publicly held asset, he was named "most respected CEO in Canada" more than once. The corporate class was celebrating the sell-out of the Canadian people. In 2004 his fame was so great that an underwater tunnel, fittingly between Canada and the U.S., (and fittingly underwater) was named for him - the Paul M. Tellier Tunnel. In 2001 he gave a speech to the Empire Club calling for greater integration of Canada and the U.S. and hinting that the time was not far off when the two countries would share one currency.

Clearly, Tellier spoke Gordon Campbell's language. Campbell, remember, first campaigned on a platform that had the privatization and sale of BC Rail in it. He lost that election, and not only dropped the plank but changed it to no sale of BC Rail. He was elected premier for the first time in 2001, and went to work very soon to betray the people he had given the promise to and to privatize (into foreign hands) BC Rail.

He tried to do the same with BC Ferries, and failed (even with a specially hired U.S. citizen CEO). He did it (in fact) with two thirds of BC Hydro, splitting the Crown Corporation into three parts - one going to Accenture (connected with the Enron disaster),and another part being set up as a dummy, wholly-owned Canadian power distribution system (which will be wholly controlled from the U.S.). The third part is what British Columbians think of as BC Hydro. It has been castrated and is forbidden to generate a single watt of new electric power, but must buy all increases of power now from private sources (soon, often, to be in U.S, hands) - private generators of power to whom the Campbell government is selling all rights to BC rivers.

As fate would have it, Paul Tellier arrived in Vancouver in June of 2002 to deliver a speech to the Canadian Club. In it he told the grand romance of the sell-out of publicly-owned CNR and its huge success as a private corporation with a majority of U.S. shareholders. True to the pre-Crash prophets of the time, he also pushed for more deregulation. Then he talked about BC Rail and observed that it, too, could do what CN had done. It, too, could get free of the chains of public ownership.

I suppose the question is just who suggested Paul Tellier as speaker at the Canadian Club? Did he meet Gordon Campbell when he was here? Did anyone here suggest that Tellier connect the privatization of CNR with BC Rail as he did in his speech?

Apparently, Paul Tellier was back in Vancouver in August 2002 at which time he met with Dan Doyle, Deputy Minister of Transportation. Did they talk about the takeover by CNR of BC Rail? Did Tellier talk to Gordon Campbell? Alas, the documents gathered through Freedom of Information don't answer those questions.

Paul Tellier, the corporate miracle-worker, next went as CEO of Bombardier in 2003. He was hired to work his faultless magic there. He cut 16,000 people from the Bombardier work force, sold off the famous Bombardier Ski-doo branch, and watched shares drop by 50%. The Bombardier family became so disenchanted they dumped (graciously) wonder-boy Tellier and set to work to rebuild (successfully) the Bombardier operations he was destroying.

The vapour trail that leads to the corrupt sale of BC Rail begins in the 1990s when Gordon Campbell had the sale in his platform. It left the Campbell platform but not Campbell's intentions. By merest accident the poster boy for privatized sell-out - CNR's Paul Tellier - came to Vancouver in April 2002 just on the cusp of BC Rail sale beginnings and in a speech put sold-out CNR and BC Rail together for comparison. And then he seems to have dropped back in August for talks with, at least, the deputy minister of transportation. What a coincidence. And what a coincidence that come hell or high water Gordon Campbell drove through the sale of BC Rail to CNR - bidding protocols and fairness to other bidders shattered in the process.

It is hard to find a smoking gun at the bottom of a swamp. If there had been a Public Inquiry into the plainly improper sale of BC Rail in 2004, smoking guns would have appeared in more than one place. But the Campbell forces set to work to hose down everything to do with the matter. The hoses are still playing on the BC Rail Scandal, and the bedraggled actors in the Basi, Virk, and Basi drama are barely keeping their heads above water, are growing older and older, and are clinging to an idea of justice that is waterlogged and sinking into the bog before their eyes.

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Tuesday, March 03, 2009

 

Basi Virk: 8,000 pages of confidential government documents as requested by Defence and released to NDP, also available to the public

.

Times Colonist has already been busy explaining to us (see L
es Leyne - BC Rail Case buried in political trivia) that the 15 folders of secret documents have ... (nudge, nudge) ... no significance. Yeah, right.

Heck, we've seen important stuff like the trial, conviction, and sentencing of Mr Big, go unreported in Big Media, so we're not so easily bamboozled these days. Somehow it seems logical that B.C. government employees might be overworked on this kind of round-the-clock mission. But after winning a glimpse of the 8,000 pages, only The Globe and Mail seems willing to tell us how some of our tax dollars are being spent. I mean, is that legal -- using our money to work against us? And then telling us about budget deficits? - BC Mary.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

RAIDS LED LIBERALS TO POLISH THEIR IMAGE

Mark Hume
The Globe and Mail - March 3, 2009

... The files show how carefully the media was being monitored by the government following the legislature raids, with several thick binders containing thousands of pages of transcripts of radio, television and print reports.

One document shows the government set up a media monitoring office to run from 5 a.m. to 8 p.m., seven days a week, "to ensure ... constant hour-to-hour, 'one window' media monitoring."

Also in the files are documents that show how, after the legislature raids, the RCMP informed the government that the pending sale of a BC Rail port subdivision may have been compromised by leaks of confidential information ....

Read the full story here.

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""


Monday, March 02, 2009

 

Basi Virk: First reports from the 8,000 pages of confidential government documents

.
Bill Tieleman provides two exclusive stories based on the 8000 pages of confidential government documents ordered released by BC Supreme Court last week – and he is the only journalist who has seen them!

First, two of the lobbyists involved in the BC Legislature Raid case in 2003 emailed BC’s Deputy Attorney General in 2005 with a “Dear Allan” personal message!

Read Bill's report here!


Second,Bill reveals secret government orders to Ministerial Assistants to ensure Cabinet Ministers don’t answer questions in Question Period and how they are supposed to spin the media.

Read Bill's second report here!

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""