Sunday, August 10, 2008
Campbell vs the truth about BCRail
Another thank you to North Van's Grumps who discovered this item which undoubtedly explains why British Columbia has never seen a photo of Campbell holding a 4x8 ft. cheque for a Billion Dollars. - BC Mary
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Truth About BC Rail
The President's Message - Barry O'Neill
NDP leader Carol James is right to call for an election on the BC Rail sale. And she is right to agree with her predecessor about Gordon Campbell’s inability to tell the truth. The premier says that our railway has lost $860 million.
|
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
*********************
Well its not so confidential now, its at the local "library" in Victoria, probably courteous of it having been leaked to a Union which did its own interpretation of the BC Rail assets. One really has to wonder why CN Rail paid only One Billion Dollars, in cash.
Here's the : Union document courtesy of BC Government Publications Index
We've known for sometime that Campbell has been lying about the billion dollar giveaway...the scary part is that so much of the government's business is no longer being done by the dedicated professionals in the public service.
Supplanted by outside consultants and lawyers, enabled by secrecy and side deals, it becomes clearer and clearer that Gordon Campbell had an agenda for all of this before he came to power.
He should be tried for treason, if not fraud.
I'd really like to see someone, Bill Tieleman perhaps, take all of this data and start to pull it together in a form sufficiently transparent so that every British Columbian would understand why the executive council is so adamant NOT to ever let the details behind the giveaway of BC Rail come to light.
Published: Monday, August 11, 2008
The Internet should be the first stop for anyone interested in launching a lawsuit, learning about the law, keeping abreast of a particular case or following legal debates." SNIP
BC Courts' site http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/
Osgoode Hall Law School ... Supreme Court of Canada decisions and issues at http://www.thecourt.ca/.
The B.C. Courthouse Library Society also provides a great legal resource -- rules, cases,
http://www.bccls.bc.ca/cms/index.cfm?group_id=8108/.
http://www.llrx.com/features/ca.htm/. It's an unbelievable gold mine.
Want to stay abreast of the ambulance chasers?
http://icbclaw.com/blog/, a site created by Erik Magraken, a Victoria lawyer law firm Stikeman Elliott is producing a first-rate corporate finance blog at http://www.canadiansecuritieslaw.com/
Want to know about mergers, acquisitions, timely disclosure, compliance, some Securities and Exchange Commission ruling
http://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/
former justice John Bouk
http://bouckslawblog.typepad.com/
ex-provincial court judge Wallace Craig's http://www.realjustice.ca/
If you're looking for Canadian legal blogs
http://www.lawblogs.ca/.
When you really want to drill down, go to http://law.alltop.com/ -- wow!
That's the thing about the Web; it's not a library, it's a warehouse of libraries and for a text-driven profession such as law it has been a boon.
the great Google Reader service, which allows me to subscribe to RSS feeds from various sites -- the electronic notification when something new is posted.
I really like http://www.lexmonitor.com/, a daily review of log blogs and journals.
The University of Pittsburgh School of Law also produces a fabulous site of international legal news http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/.
You can get other worthwhile roundups at:
http://www.topix.com/law/, http://kevin.lexblog.com/, http://www.inter-alia.net/, http://www.law.com/newswire/ or http://blog.lawinfo.com/.
The Wall Street Journal Law Blog at http://blogs.wsj.com/law/.
Last but not least:
http://www.abovethelaw.com/ or http://www.greedyassociates.com/.
You might be amazed at what judges and lawyers get up to.
SNIP
imulgrew@vancouversun.com
"Here's the : Union document courtesy of BC Government Publications Index"
Yeah, but the document talks about $2.05 billion in "tax pools", which I infer to be both previous years capital and non-capital losses.
And $857 million in non-capital losses, which I infer to be previous years operating losses.
Who'd wanna buy that pig-in-a-poke??
<< Home