Tuesday, April 27, 2010


Basi Virk trial: yesterday and tomorrow

Reminder:  according to the

Public Access Completed Supreme Court List (Adult) 
for files appearing 26 APR 2010 
(see pages 23, 24)

Yesterday, in BC Supreme Court, it was recorded that the curtain will go up again on that long-running Gong Show (File #23299) at 10:00 AM on April 28, 2010, in Courtroom 53, for the next Basi-Virk Pre-Trial Hearing. Everybody welcome.

 Now, the media  performance: 

The Province - April 26, 2010
To read the article, click HERE.


Times Colonist - April 27, 2010

Read it HERE.


The Province - April 27, 2010
 Read it HERE.

Vancouver Sun - April 27, 2010
Same as Times Colonist entry (above).

And then there are the old documents which take on added meaning in the light of new ... um, er ... developments, is that the word? Developments?

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

Part IV - Notice of Application for Disclosure

By Anonymous

On Sunday we paused our exploration of the defence version of the BC Rail case at paragraph 41. The government of the day has just accepted a bid from CN for the purchase of our B.C. Rail asset; a big chunk of public property and, coincidentally or not, an enormous player in the industrial economy of the province and a potential future player in the public transportation infrastructure has been lost to this province. This happened, as we have already seen, because of a process that, at the very least, has been called into serious question.

I do not intend to get into the details of the 'sale' again at this time. Those who wish to do so can read back over paragraphs 30 - 41 to refresh their memory about what the lawyers for the defendants have said about the 'process'. Suffice to say that, if these allegations and the evidence from the RCMP wiretaps can be sustained in court, there is a strong indication that the 'sale' of B.C. Rail was not an arm's-length commercial transaction. In fact, there is at least the appearance that this was not a legitimate tender and bid process at all. In fact, as much as this case has been characterized as the Basi case, the name it was given last fall - the B.C.Rail case - is far more appropriate.

As we move on to the narrative of events from November 25, 2003 until just prior to the notorious Raid on the Legislature of December 28, readers will encounter some new characters. By the end of this story - that is, by the time we've completed the tour of the Application's “Introduction”, we're going to need a dance card to list all the players.

Immediately after the public announcement that CN was the successful 'bidder' for the spoils of BC Rail, it seems that Finance Minister Collins looked at his day-timer and decided that OmniTRAX was his next priority.

Paragraph 42 - 43 tell us that between November 28, 2003 and December 8, 2003 the RCMP learned, two “… OmniTRAX Executives Pat Broe and Dwight Johnson were going to meet with Minister Collins.” We're told that the meeting is to take place on December 12 at the Villa Del Lupo restaurant in Vancouver. In ¶ 44 we learn this set into motion an elaborate surveillance operation and in ¶ 45 and ¶ 46 we learn why:

¶ 45. The intercepted communication in which Mr. Basi advised Mr. Virk that Minister Collins authorized the Consolation Prize was of substantial significance in respect of whether any criminal wrongdoing could be attributable to Mr. Basi and Mr. Virk.

¶ 46. The RCMP were aware that if Mr. Collins met privately with the OmniTRAX Executives, that this tended to significantly corroborate Mr. Basi's previous advice to Mr. Virk that Minister Collins had approved the Consolation Prize.

And the narrative goes on:

¶ 47. The RCMP were aware that Mr. Virk dealt directly with Minister Collins on the sale of B.C. Rail. To that end, it would make no sense for Mr. Basi to deceive Mr. Virk with respect to Minister Collins' position on the Consolation Prize. The RCMP were also acutely aware that it would make no sense for Mr. Basi to advise OmniTRAX that Minister Collins had authorized the Consolation Prize, and then organize a private meeting between those parties, if that were not the case.

A quick word of caution here: It is important to remember, again, that this is the defence version of events and is, in the nature of its implications only plausible if one accepts the 'theory' the defence is putting forward. These conclusions may well be valid - but they have not yet been tested before a judge. They are only theories at this point. And the use of the phrase 'it would make no sense' is highly suspect and requires the reader to draw conclusions that may be unwarranted.

In any case, a meeting between Mr Collins and two OmniTRAX executives did take place. One can imagine the dramatic possibilities this little meal holds for future exploitation. Let's continue.

¶ 48. On December 12, 2003, Minister Collins in fact met with the OmniTRAX Executives privately at Villa Del Lupo restaurant, wherein the RCMP engaged in a massive surveillance operation to document this meeting. The surveillance included undercover operatives both inside and outside the restaurant and extensive video surveillance and tracking of the parties.

The next section of this story concerns complicated issues and the numerous personalities of several additional individuals as we take the story from that fine dining experience.

Just as a final toast, here's a little blurb about Villa Del Lupo from the restaurant's website:

"Tucked away in a discrete, private setting in the heart of downtown Vancouver, Villa del Lupo offers an unparalleled dining experience. Situated in an ornate heritage mansion, the restaurant boasts a charming and engaging atmosphere that makes guests feel at ease. A visit to the 'House of the Wolf' is like taking a sensory trip into the glory days of a bygone era, an environment that combines the rustic charm of an old world European villa and a 30's-style speakeasy with the swank sophistication of modern technique.

"Villa del Lupo has cultivated a loyal following by consistently delivering a dining experience that remains unsurpassed for over fifteen years, constantly providing a veritable feast for the senses. Skillfully combining prompt, knowledgeable service with an extensive award-winning wine list and a menu that will feed not only the body but the soul, you will find your every desire satiated by the 'House of the Wolf'."

Somehow it seems apt.


45.) what is 'consolation prize'?

I thought jury selection was to take place this month...
Anonymous 11:13,

Roberts bank has been referred to as the "Consolation Prize",

but as for Jury selection, blame Madam MacKenzie's publication ban

which seems to have scared most journalists speechless.
Interesting to read over the paragraphs again Mary. One only hopes the paid media will be a little more diligent once this case actually gets into court - open court.

There is already so much information available - thank you for making readers aware of what this case is actually all about.
re: above comment.

How could Roberts Bank, have been approved by the finance minister, as a consolation prize???

I'm guessing that this case is going to be thrown out, do to the fact that, none of the 'facts' make any sense.
What ever happened to, "organised crime,terrorism, police corruption and political interference"...
The consolation prize was allegedly offered in order to keep OmniTRAX in the bidding process, even though they (allegedly) knew they would not win.

The Roberts Bank line remains in the hands of BCR because of this, so the story goes; connections to the case made the transaction inviable. No serious company would touch it now, as it was (allegedly) collateral in an (allegedly) illegal transaction.

If that's contrary to the publication ban, I can't see why; scores of webpages exist that mention it.....(including the archives of this blog, which remain online despite the ban, like other political blogs)...It's also in various editions of the CanWest papers, though to access those news items now would require payment to access their article-archive.
If Justice MacKenzie moves on, maybe we'll get a judge who will lift the ban.
Anon 12:15,

What is it with people who rush to surrender all hope?

Guess again, why not, and hope that justice will prevail.

And to answer your first question: why not type "Consolation Prize" into the Search Box at the top of this page, and look at all the material provided about it on this blog.
Mary, two things. First I think some of your comenters should visit your historical posts.

Second, off topic there is a bogus AntiHST site appearing on the net.
Please everyone the only two sites that should be visited are Elections BC and http://fighthst.com Do not make donations to the bogus site.
Buried in yesterday's story in The Province is this little nugget:

In other news, recently appointed B.C. Supreme Court Justice Robert Prior announced his resignation. He had been appointed to the bench March 22. He resigned April 16.

He resigns less than a month later???? This little whiff of smoke may be an indication of a fire in the belly of the beast.

There was no further comment on this sudden resignation. Isn't it odd just what a lack of curiosity there is in the MSM? No interest in knowing why?

Myself, I’ve just come from a morning at another BC court house where a BC Supreme Court judge a) did not bother to read the Chambers Record, or even the motion he was presiding over, and b) ignored the Rules of Court with regard to hearing court applications, and c) collaborated beforehand with one of the parties in an attempt to mislead the other participants, and presided over a fraud of a court session with the outcome established beforehand.

This is not just my interpretation, but that of others present, including lawyers.

The entire court system in BC is riddled with corruption. There is nowhere and no-one to turn to in this province. No one.
Canadian Canary: Jack Cram warned about all this years ago, and was charged with contempt of court, beaten by police, and forced to take psychiatric drugs as a way to avoid a prison sentence for contempt. It was in regard to native land claims cases, but his allegations of a close conspiracy/cabal between politicians, judges, police and corporations are not unrelated to all of what we're finding out now....
Thanks Skookum 1, it helps to know who else has had their lives smashed by the corruption of BC courts and judiciary.

We won't give up trying to expose/expunge...

Just by Googling Jack Cram, BC I was able to get quite a bit of useful information about other corrupt actions on the part of the BC courts and judiciary.

Thanks very much,
CC: if the CanWest rags hadn't destroyed their pre-1993 archives, you would have found a lot more....the dirt on that, Oka-type incidents, Solidarity '83 and the "April Fool's Interregnum", Fantasy Gardens, BRCIC, ICBC, the driver's licensing scandal and lots more that was in those papers back then (such coverage as it was) is now only viewable in hard copy at the VPL, Archives, the university libraries etc, and is not digitally searchable SFAIK.
CC: if the CanWest rags hadn't destroyed their pre-1993 archives, you would have found a lot more....the dirt on the Cram Affair, Oka-type incidents, Solidarity '83 and the "April Fool's Interregnum", Fantasy Gardens, BRCIC, ICBC, the driver's licensing scandal, the FCBC's backing of the '75 election and the subsequent transfer of 80% of the Government Reserve to the Big Five forest companies, the engineering of the '83 election by the Big Blue Machine, and lots more that was in those papers back then (such coverage as it was) is now only viewable in hard copy at the VPL, Archives, the university libraries etc, and is not digitally searchable SFAIK.
Post a Comment

<< Home