Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Another assault on Delta and all of B.C., says Gentner. Update: coal protests in Washington State, U.S.A., similar to Deltaport issues.
.
BC Mary comment: This is about the strange set-up at Deltaport ... thanks to Delta Optimist for this report dated May 31, 2011
"Yet another assault on Delta and all of B.C," says Guy Gentner, MLA for Delta North, "where multi-national corporation profits take precedence over the needs of British Columbians."
On February 22, just four days before Premier Christy Clark was elected as the Leader of the BC Liberals and Premier of British Columbia, the government put out a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the feasibility a B.C. Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ) Program that will "reduce/eliminate international barriers to trade, investment, labour mobility and competitiveness."
John Ries from the Sauder School of Economics at UBC has stated that Foreign Trade Zones are simply a race to the bottom. With Foreign Trade Zones, the Liberal government has to provide subsidies to multi-national corporations and loosen environmental and labour standards. It is unclear what the benefits are to British Columbians, but it is clear that Foreign Trade Zones are indicators of a failed economic policy.
{Snip} ...
... Gentner stood in the Legislature during question period and estimates to question the Minister of Transportation and Minister of Jobs, Tourism and Innovation whose ministries have both signed off on the RFP. Gentner asked each time what the benefits of FTZs are to British Columbia, and got nothing of substance that would assure British Columbians this is not a race to the bottom as stated by John Reis from Sauder School of Economics at UBC.
"The people of Delta and British Columbia want answers and we are again not getting them from this Liberal government," said Gentner. "We have seen time and again the secrecy within which this government continues to operate. The implementation of the HST, the sale of BC Rail, ramming through legislation without proper debate, are all examples of how the rights of British Columbians are be abrogated in the interests of corporations and profits."
Read more HERE:
http://www.delta-optimist.com/Another+assault+Delta+says+Gentner/4870718/story.html#ixzz1NzWKpNuv
BC Mary comment: This is about the strange set-up at Deltaport ... thanks to Delta Optimist for this report dated May 31, 2011
"Yet another assault on Delta and all of B.C," says Guy Gentner, MLA for Delta North, "where multi-national corporation profits take precedence over the needs of British Columbians."
On February 22, just four days before Premier Christy Clark was elected as the Leader of the BC Liberals and Premier of British Columbia, the government put out a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the feasibility a B.C. Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ) Program that will "reduce/eliminate international barriers to trade, investment, labour mobility and competitiveness."
John Ries from the Sauder School of Economics at UBC has stated that Foreign Trade Zones are simply a race to the bottom. With Foreign Trade Zones, the Liberal government has to provide subsidies to multi-national corporations and loosen environmental and labour standards. It is unclear what the benefits are to British Columbians, but it is clear that Foreign Trade Zones are indicators of a failed economic policy.
{Snip} ...
... Gentner stood in the Legislature during question period and estimates to question the Minister of Transportation and Minister of Jobs, Tourism and Innovation whose ministries have both signed off on the RFP. Gentner asked each time what the benefits of FTZs are to British Columbia, and got nothing of substance that would assure British Columbians this is not a race to the bottom as stated by John Reis from Sauder School of Economics at UBC.
"The people of Delta and British Columbia want answers and we are again not getting them from this Liberal government," said Gentner. "We have seen time and again the secrecy within which this government continues to operate. The implementation of the HST, the sale of BC Rail, ramming through legislation without proper debate, are all examples of how the rights of British Columbians are be abrogated in the interests of corporations and profits."
Read more HERE:
http://www.delta-optimist.com/Another+assault+Delta+says+Gentner/4870718/story.html#ixzz1NzWKpNuv
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
In Washington State, U.S.A., not far from Deltaport BC, a righteous battle rages between the shippers of coal and those who realize what coal shipments do to the land and sea.
Please visit the article to access several important links.
Update: Bellingham Mayor Dan Pike today announced his opposition to plans for a coal port near the city. Earlier in the week, the growing debate over the global warming implications of shipping coal to China brought big turnouts to meetings there.
By Floyd McKay
June 02, 2011.
Bellingham Mayor Dan Pike said Friday (June 3) that he will work to oppose a bulk shipping terminal at Cherry Point north of the city that plans to export some 48 million tons of coal a year to China. Pike commented after a pair of public meetings this week that brought out large-scale opposition to the proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal.
Although Pike has stated in the past that he wants environmental review of the $500 million project to go beyond the terminal site and include Bellingham and other impacted communities, his statement moves beyond that stated concern to outright opposition to the project as it is now planned. It is the heavy reliance on coal — nearly 90 percent of planned exports — and the resultant rail traffic that focuses his concerns.
Pike's concern about coal and rail impacts is echoed by his chief opponent in the fall mayoral election, former state Rep. Kelli Linville, who lives with her family some 75 yards from the main switching yard in Bellingham. Linville said she has always been an opponent of burning coal and supported the state's "no coal" policies; she also raises concerns about additional rail traffic.
She said, however, that she will wait for the public process to comment at an official on-the-record public hearing, rather than state her final position now. "I support the public process; let it work its way through," she told Crosscut. She noted that it would be very difficult for terminal developers to mitigate impacts to local communities, which could include major upgrades to rail crossings and other improvements.
The difference between Pike and Linville can be boiled down to timing and emphasis. Pike on Feb. 28 stated that he would await the formal process before taking a firm position on the coal port; Linville has maintained that stance throughout.
Pike said Friday he simply sees no chance that Gateway Pacific, to be operated by SSA Marine and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad, which would transport the coal from the Powder River Basin to Cherry Point, are willing to consider helping local communities mitigate the considerable impact of the coal shipments.
"I hoped they would make a commitment to provide meaningful mitigations or — even better — a willingness consider other commodities, and not rely exclusively on coal exports for the terminal's financial engine," Pike said.
"Instead, these proponents brought denial of any potential harms and blatant defiance that they should change their plans in any way. In fact, it has become public knowledge that they have signed a multi-year deal with Montana's Peabody Coal to ship at least 24 million tons of coal from our sensitive shores as their major focus of business for the foreseeable future.
"That is not a future that I want to see. By any calculation, the proposed coal-dependent terminal at Cherry Point does not add up. I will, therefore, work with citizen groups, other elected officials, businesses and the health care community to oppose the current plan for the proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal."
Linville said she was in agreement with Pike on the matter of mitigating the impact of the coal shipments, and is also concerned that coal is to be the major export from the terminal.
Commenting to The Bellingham Herald in May, Linville noted that she had supported an earlier plan to build an export terminal at Cherry Point, but the 1992 project did not mention exporting coal. "I did not support a dedicated coal port," she said. "I'm opposed to a single-purpose port. I support a final pier up there that supports multiple exports."
She also said she fought for steps to phase out coal-fired power in this state while she was a legislator. "I don't support coal-burning," she said. "I would much rather be exporting clean energy technology to China. ... We should be investing in what we want to have happen, instead of fighting what we don't want to have happen."
The third candidate in the mayor's race, Clayton Petree, was also quoted in the Herald story as waiting for more information before deciding on the terminal. "This is a time to listen, learn, and participate — not leap one way or another based on speculation about something we don't yet know enough about," Petree said. "In this case, the boldest approach is caution." He expressed particular concern about the impact on the city's planned waterfront development.
Although Bellingham is the largest city in Whatcom County, it will be the Whatcom County Commission that will ultimately decide the fate of applications for a shoreline permit and a final project permit. Formal applications have yet to be filed by SSA Marine, although preliminary study has already begun by county, state and federal agencies. When the applications are filed, the formal process of taking public testimony will begin, with early emphasis on setting the scope of the review process.
Scoping, as the procedure is called, determines if the environmental studies will be limited to the terminal site or expanded to include impacts on Bellingham and other communities. Rail traffic drawn by the site-about 18 additional trains of more than a mile in length-will carry coal and return empties from Gateway Pacific at full capacity of the planned terminal. Several communities, including Bellingham and Ferndale in Whatcom County, are bisected by the tracks.
Friday's statements by Pike and Linville followed an intense week on the part of coalport opponents, with two large gatherings Tuesday and Wednesday night, bringing out some heated rhetoric against the Gateway Pacific proposal and the idea of exporting coal in general. The week began in Fairhaven's Village Green, where a nationally known opponent of coal took the stage before a large and enthusiastic crowd.
"This is the perfect place for this fight," environmental author and global-warming warrior Bill McKibben told a crowd of nearly 1,000 Tuesday (May 31) in Bellingham, kicking off two days of events in a community many regard as the "greenest" in the state.
McKibben, whose 1989 book, The End of Nature, was the first popular-press warning of the approach of global warming, came to Bellingham to stir what has been a relatively low-key opposition to SSA Marine's proposal to build a $500 million export facility at Cherry Point, north of Bellingham. It would export up to 48 million tons of coal annually to China, to be burned powering electrical plants there, and 6 million tons of other undetermined bulk commodities.
Enthusiasm stirred by McKibben and organized largely by Re Sources, a local sustainability organization, resulted in 800 signatures on petitions to elected officials calling for community impacts to be included in environmental impact studies for the Gateway Pacific Terminal. SSA has opposed expanding the studies beyond borders of the site, which could mean the project operators would be required to mitigate the effects of additional trains and other off-site impacts.
The tide of opposition spilled over to a Wednesday community forum called by Mayor Pike, as about 300 people packed a municipal courtroom and another 200 waited outside to address Pike regarding their concerns about the project. The mayor has said he wants community impact to be considered in the environmental reviews.
The forums marked a change in the tenor of the battle for the export terminal. SSA Marine last fall started a quiet campaign to line up political support for the plan, and by the time Bellingham residents were aware the effort was afoot, the project had lined up a group of small-town mayors, Congressman Rick Larsen, three legislators, the local Chamber of Commerce, and the Northwest Washington Central Labor Council. Leading the effort was Craig Cole, a former county councilman and retired businessman with strong community connections.
Re Sources and some environmental leaders began organizing early this year, focusing their efforts on coal as the chief export for the terminal. McKibben emphasized the role of coal in the Cherry Point plan Tuesday, referring to coal as "the most dangerous substance on the planet" and urging his Bellingham audience to play a key role in combating climate change.
"Climate change is one of the first chances we have ever had to find out if we really are all brothers and sisters," McKibben said of the global movement to combat global warming. Bellingham, because of its reputation for sustainability and support for a green economy, is an ideal place to combat coal mining and exports, he stated.
While Whatcom County will prepare the crucial final project permit, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers the shoreline permit, and several state agencies are involved in preparing environmental data for those permits. Bellingham is not a direct player in the process, but it is about 40 percent of the county's population.
Mayor Pike, mindful of the city's role (or lack of a role), asked his Wednesday night forum to tell him what community impacts should be studied in the process, beyond those that will be examined on the Gateway Pacific site. He got an earful, as about 50 people approached the microphones to express concerns.
Nearly all of the concerns focused on coal as the major export commodity, and most told Pike that health issues from breathing coal dust and diesel fumes from added coal trains are their major worries. Sara Mostad, a Bellingham physician, presented a petition with the names of 80 local doctors, and said medical research shows a clear danger to air and water quality from coal dust, including an impact on asthma and other respiratory issues. Her testimony was seconded by a woman who described herself as a lung cancer survivor living near the railroad tracks.
The majority of those speaking appeared to be solidly against exporting coal from Cherry Point under any circumstances, echoing McKibben's call the previous night. Dana Lyons of Bellingham called for "civil disobedience in every town along the route" if necessary to halt the coal trains. He drew loud cheers from the crowd, despite admonitions against applause.
While the evening evoked more applause for project opponents, labor leader David Warren, recently retired as head of the Northwest Washington Central Labor Council, charged opponents with fear-mongering and distortions, and accused Re Sources of refusing to meet with labor leaders. "Our relationship is over," Warren stated heatedly, "We're going to fight for these jobs."
When Warren concluded, "let me express my disappointment at how quickly the people of this community can turn their backs on the unemployed," he drew catcalls from the audience. Warren and two other labor representatives were the only speakers defending the project; several other speakers identified themselves as union members before blasting the project and calling for jobs that did no harm the environment.
Although health concerns were the predominant worry at the forum, several of the speakers addressed the impact of more large trains on the economy and livability of the community. Six coal trains of about a mile and a half in length currently run through Bellingham en route to Roberts Bank south of Vancouver; half are full, the others are returning empty cars to the Powder River Basin in Wyoming. Gateway Pacific, in full operation, would add about 18 trains a day, full and empty, to the six already running, and the trains are expected to be longer and heavier than current trains.
In a previous statement of concern, Mayor Pike cited the impact of the added trains to the city's ambitious plans to remake a former mill site into a new mix of business, office, and residential developments on the city's waterfront. The Burlington Northern Santa Fe tracks run through the development site. Speakers also cited the impact on popular parks in the city and along Chuckanut Drive, where train tracks run through or alongside the facilities.
Although most of the speakers were from Bellingham, several spoke from Ferndale, a smaller community closer to Cherry Point, where railroad traffic bisects the city; and also from rural communities opposing any plan to shift coal traffic to an alternate rail line running from Burlington north to Sumas.
Wednesday night's forum played no formal role in the review process, other than to show community opposition to the project and perhaps provide some cover for leaders who may want to oppose the terminal but are concerned about organized labor's charge that they oppose high-wage jobs. SSA Marine says it will provide about 280 full-time jobs when the terminal is built to capacity, plus temporary construction jobs building the facility. Whatcom County has an unemployment rate above the state average, and local project backers have cited jobs as their primary argument for building the terminal.
Behind the scenes, politics will heat up in coming months and could be crucial to a final outcome. In addition to the city mayoral race, County Executive Pete Kremen is stepping down, opening that critical position for a fall vote. Thus far, only conservatives from outside Bellingham have shown an interest in filing for the position; project opponents have yet to get a candidate into the race. Three county council members are also up this year. Ultimately, the county council, now with a pro-development majority, will join the Executive in deciding the key project permit.
That decision could be two years down the line; SSA Marine has yet to file a formal permit application, although state and county agencies are already working on preliminary papers. A team of environmental specialists, organized as a Multi-Agency Permit Team (MAP), working out of the governor's office, has been meeting behind closed doors since November, reviewing SSA Marine's proposals. The MAP team has posted documents from its considerations, but participation has been limited to representatives of eight state, local, and federal agencies plus Gateway Pacific. No outside organizations have been allowed to attend the sessions. This prompted an April 27 letter to the MAP team from Bellingham environmental lawyers Barbara Dykes and Tom Erlichman, who represent some private businesses and property owners in Whatcom County.
Their letter concluded: "A student of the . . . process might conclude, sadly, that the exercise lacks perspective and grounding in reality, when it excludes the majority of affected jurisdictions, businesses, property owners, and citizens along the affected transportation corridor. Public confidence can be restored in the (MAP) review if it is quickly revised to include a broader base, allowing these affected entities to participate in the discussion about project design, impacts, and scope of agency review to come. Without that change, this post-application . . . review process behind closed doors seems skewed in favor of the applicant. The affected public is left with the impression that the review is well underway, while they are being left outside as showpieces in an agency environmental review process that is already pre-determined in many important respects."
Formal hearings to determine the scope of the environmental studies, including the issue of including communities distant from the site and impacted primarily by rail traffic, will await Gateway Pacific's formal permit application, expected within the next several weeks.
In Bellingham at least, the informal hearings have begun and the temperature is rising. Activists expect to organize in several other western Washington communities that would be impacted by rail traffic, since the coal trains would move up the state from Vancouver to Ferndale.
Floyd J. McKay, professor of journalism emeritus at Western Washington University, is a longtime Northwest journalist who covered Oregon politics for two decades. He can be reached at floydmckay@comcast.net.
Pat Rasmussen
World Temperate Rainforest Network
patr@crcwnet.com
509-669-1549
www.temperaterainforests.org
~~~~~~~
Coal-for-China debate burns its way into Bellingham's mayor race
Update: Bellingham Mayor Dan Pike today announced his opposition to plans for a coal port near the city. Earlier in the week, the growing debate over the global warming implications of shipping coal to China brought big turnouts to meetings there.
By Floyd McKay
June 02, 2011.
Bellingham Mayor Dan Pike said Friday (June 3) that he will work to oppose a bulk shipping terminal at Cherry Point north of the city that plans to export some 48 million tons of coal a year to China. Pike commented after a pair of public meetings this week that brought out large-scale opposition to the proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal.
Although Pike has stated in the past that he wants environmental review of the $500 million project to go beyond the terminal site and include Bellingham and other impacted communities, his statement moves beyond that stated concern to outright opposition to the project as it is now planned. It is the heavy reliance on coal — nearly 90 percent of planned exports — and the resultant rail traffic that focuses his concerns.
Pike's concern about coal and rail impacts is echoed by his chief opponent in the fall mayoral election, former state Rep. Kelli Linville, who lives with her family some 75 yards from the main switching yard in Bellingham. Linville said she has always been an opponent of burning coal and supported the state's "no coal" policies; she also raises concerns about additional rail traffic.
She said, however, that she will wait for the public process to comment at an official on-the-record public hearing, rather than state her final position now. "I support the public process; let it work its way through," she told Crosscut. She noted that it would be very difficult for terminal developers to mitigate impacts to local communities, which could include major upgrades to rail crossings and other improvements.
The difference between Pike and Linville can be boiled down to timing and emphasis. Pike on Feb. 28 stated that he would await the formal process before taking a firm position on the coal port; Linville has maintained that stance throughout.
Pike said Friday he simply sees no chance that Gateway Pacific, to be operated by SSA Marine and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad, which would transport the coal from the Powder River Basin to Cherry Point, are willing to consider helping local communities mitigate the considerable impact of the coal shipments.
"I hoped they would make a commitment to provide meaningful mitigations or — even better — a willingness consider other commodities, and not rely exclusively on coal exports for the terminal's financial engine," Pike said.
"Instead, these proponents brought denial of any potential harms and blatant defiance that they should change their plans in any way. In fact, it has become public knowledge that they have signed a multi-year deal with Montana's Peabody Coal to ship at least 24 million tons of coal from our sensitive shores as their major focus of business for the foreseeable future.
"That is not a future that I want to see. By any calculation, the proposed coal-dependent terminal at Cherry Point does not add up. I will, therefore, work with citizen groups, other elected officials, businesses and the health care community to oppose the current plan for the proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal."
Linville said she was in agreement with Pike on the matter of mitigating the impact of the coal shipments, and is also concerned that coal is to be the major export from the terminal.
Commenting to The Bellingham Herald in May, Linville noted that she had supported an earlier plan to build an export terminal at Cherry Point, but the 1992 project did not mention exporting coal. "I did not support a dedicated coal port," she said. "I'm opposed to a single-purpose port. I support a final pier up there that supports multiple exports."
She also said she fought for steps to phase out coal-fired power in this state while she was a legislator. "I don't support coal-burning," she said. "I would much rather be exporting clean energy technology to China. ... We should be investing in what we want to have happen, instead of fighting what we don't want to have happen."
The third candidate in the mayor's race, Clayton Petree, was also quoted in the Herald story as waiting for more information before deciding on the terminal. "This is a time to listen, learn, and participate — not leap one way or another based on speculation about something we don't yet know enough about," Petree said. "In this case, the boldest approach is caution." He expressed particular concern about the impact on the city's planned waterfront development.
Although Bellingham is the largest city in Whatcom County, it will be the Whatcom County Commission that will ultimately decide the fate of applications for a shoreline permit and a final project permit. Formal applications have yet to be filed by SSA Marine, although preliminary study has already begun by county, state and federal agencies. When the applications are filed, the formal process of taking public testimony will begin, with early emphasis on setting the scope of the review process.
Scoping, as the procedure is called, determines if the environmental studies will be limited to the terminal site or expanded to include impacts on Bellingham and other communities. Rail traffic drawn by the site-about 18 additional trains of more than a mile in length-will carry coal and return empties from Gateway Pacific at full capacity of the planned terminal. Several communities, including Bellingham and Ferndale in Whatcom County, are bisected by the tracks.
Friday's statements by Pike and Linville followed an intense week on the part of coalport opponents, with two large gatherings Tuesday and Wednesday night, bringing out some heated rhetoric against the Gateway Pacific proposal and the idea of exporting coal in general. The week began in Fairhaven's Village Green, where a nationally known opponent of coal took the stage before a large and enthusiastic crowd.
"This is the perfect place for this fight," environmental author and global-warming warrior Bill McKibben told a crowd of nearly 1,000 Tuesday (May 31) in Bellingham, kicking off two days of events in a community many regard as the "greenest" in the state.
McKibben, whose 1989 book, The End of Nature, was the first popular-press warning of the approach of global warming, came to Bellingham to stir what has been a relatively low-key opposition to SSA Marine's proposal to build a $500 million export facility at Cherry Point, north of Bellingham. It would export up to 48 million tons of coal annually to China, to be burned powering electrical plants there, and 6 million tons of other undetermined bulk commodities.
Enthusiasm stirred by McKibben and organized largely by Re Sources, a local sustainability organization, resulted in 800 signatures on petitions to elected officials calling for community impacts to be included in environmental impact studies for the Gateway Pacific Terminal. SSA has opposed expanding the studies beyond borders of the site, which could mean the project operators would be required to mitigate the effects of additional trains and other off-site impacts.
The tide of opposition spilled over to a Wednesday community forum called by Mayor Pike, as about 300 people packed a municipal courtroom and another 200 waited outside to address Pike regarding their concerns about the project. The mayor has said he wants community impact to be considered in the environmental reviews.
The forums marked a change in the tenor of the battle for the export terminal. SSA Marine last fall started a quiet campaign to line up political support for the plan, and by the time Bellingham residents were aware the effort was afoot, the project had lined up a group of small-town mayors, Congressman Rick Larsen, three legislators, the local Chamber of Commerce, and the Northwest Washington Central Labor Council. Leading the effort was Craig Cole, a former county councilman and retired businessman with strong community connections.
Re Sources and some environmental leaders began organizing early this year, focusing their efforts on coal as the chief export for the terminal. McKibben emphasized the role of coal in the Cherry Point plan Tuesday, referring to coal as "the most dangerous substance on the planet" and urging his Bellingham audience to play a key role in combating climate change.
"Climate change is one of the first chances we have ever had to find out if we really are all brothers and sisters," McKibben said of the global movement to combat global warming. Bellingham, because of its reputation for sustainability and support for a green economy, is an ideal place to combat coal mining and exports, he stated.
While Whatcom County will prepare the crucial final project permit, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers the shoreline permit, and several state agencies are involved in preparing environmental data for those permits. Bellingham is not a direct player in the process, but it is about 40 percent of the county's population.
Mayor Pike, mindful of the city's role (or lack of a role), asked his Wednesday night forum to tell him what community impacts should be studied in the process, beyond those that will be examined on the Gateway Pacific site. He got an earful, as about 50 people approached the microphones to express concerns.
Nearly all of the concerns focused on coal as the major export commodity, and most told Pike that health issues from breathing coal dust and diesel fumes from added coal trains are their major worries. Sara Mostad, a Bellingham physician, presented a petition with the names of 80 local doctors, and said medical research shows a clear danger to air and water quality from coal dust, including an impact on asthma and other respiratory issues. Her testimony was seconded by a woman who described herself as a lung cancer survivor living near the railroad tracks.
The majority of those speaking appeared to be solidly against exporting coal from Cherry Point under any circumstances, echoing McKibben's call the previous night. Dana Lyons of Bellingham called for "civil disobedience in every town along the route" if necessary to halt the coal trains. He drew loud cheers from the crowd, despite admonitions against applause.
While the evening evoked more applause for project opponents, labor leader David Warren, recently retired as head of the Northwest Washington Central Labor Council, charged opponents with fear-mongering and distortions, and accused Re Sources of refusing to meet with labor leaders. "Our relationship is over," Warren stated heatedly, "We're going to fight for these jobs."
When Warren concluded, "let me express my disappointment at how quickly the people of this community can turn their backs on the unemployed," he drew catcalls from the audience. Warren and two other labor representatives were the only speakers defending the project; several other speakers identified themselves as union members before blasting the project and calling for jobs that did no harm the environment.
Although health concerns were the predominant worry at the forum, several of the speakers addressed the impact of more large trains on the economy and livability of the community. Six coal trains of about a mile and a half in length currently run through Bellingham en route to Roberts Bank south of Vancouver; half are full, the others are returning empty cars to the Powder River Basin in Wyoming. Gateway Pacific, in full operation, would add about 18 trains a day, full and empty, to the six already running, and the trains are expected to be longer and heavier than current trains.
In a previous statement of concern, Mayor Pike cited the impact of the added trains to the city's ambitious plans to remake a former mill site into a new mix of business, office, and residential developments on the city's waterfront. The Burlington Northern Santa Fe tracks run through the development site. Speakers also cited the impact on popular parks in the city and along Chuckanut Drive, where train tracks run through or alongside the facilities.
Although most of the speakers were from Bellingham, several spoke from Ferndale, a smaller community closer to Cherry Point, where railroad traffic bisects the city; and also from rural communities opposing any plan to shift coal traffic to an alternate rail line running from Burlington north to Sumas.
Wednesday night's forum played no formal role in the review process, other than to show community opposition to the project and perhaps provide some cover for leaders who may want to oppose the terminal but are concerned about organized labor's charge that they oppose high-wage jobs. SSA Marine says it will provide about 280 full-time jobs when the terminal is built to capacity, plus temporary construction jobs building the facility. Whatcom County has an unemployment rate above the state average, and local project backers have cited jobs as their primary argument for building the terminal.
Behind the scenes, politics will heat up in coming months and could be crucial to a final outcome. In addition to the city mayoral race, County Executive Pete Kremen is stepping down, opening that critical position for a fall vote. Thus far, only conservatives from outside Bellingham have shown an interest in filing for the position; project opponents have yet to get a candidate into the race. Three county council members are also up this year. Ultimately, the county council, now with a pro-development majority, will join the Executive in deciding the key project permit.
That decision could be two years down the line; SSA Marine has yet to file a formal permit application, although state and county agencies are already working on preliminary papers. A team of environmental specialists, organized as a Multi-Agency Permit Team (MAP), working out of the governor's office, has been meeting behind closed doors since November, reviewing SSA Marine's proposals. The MAP team has posted documents from its considerations, but participation has been limited to representatives of eight state, local, and federal agencies plus Gateway Pacific. No outside organizations have been allowed to attend the sessions. This prompted an April 27 letter to the MAP team from Bellingham environmental lawyers Barbara Dykes and Tom Erlichman, who represent some private businesses and property owners in Whatcom County.
Their letter concluded: "A student of the . . . process might conclude, sadly, that the exercise lacks perspective and grounding in reality, when it excludes the majority of affected jurisdictions, businesses, property owners, and citizens along the affected transportation corridor. Public confidence can be restored in the (MAP) review if it is quickly revised to include a broader base, allowing these affected entities to participate in the discussion about project design, impacts, and scope of agency review to come. Without that change, this post-application . . . review process behind closed doors seems skewed in favor of the applicant. The affected public is left with the impression that the review is well underway, while they are being left outside as showpieces in an agency environmental review process that is already pre-determined in many important respects."
Formal hearings to determine the scope of the environmental studies, including the issue of including communities distant from the site and impacted primarily by rail traffic, will await Gateway Pacific's formal permit application, expected within the next several weeks.
In Bellingham at least, the informal hearings have begun and the temperature is rising. Activists expect to organize in several other western Washington communities that would be impacted by rail traffic, since the coal trains would move up the state from Vancouver to Ferndale.
Floyd J. McKay, professor of journalism emeritus at Western Washington University, is a longtime Northwest journalist who covered Oregon politics for two decades. He can be reached at floydmckay@comcast.net.
Pat Rasmussen
World Temperate Rainforest Network
patr@crcwnet.com
509-669-1549
www.temperaterainforests.org
___________________________________________
Questions? Email arthurcaldicott@sqwalk.com
or dawnc1@telus.net
or dawnc1@telus.net
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
CN to start construction of Calgary Logistics Park in summer 2011.
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/cn-to-start-construction-of-calgary-logistics-park-in-summer-2011-123831954.html
"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Comments:
<< Home
Mary, Laila has alot of info on her site regarding ALR land, perimeter road and it truly is an eye opener. These plans, in my opinion, have been in the works for a very long time.
http://deltafreepress.ca/201102161563/Opinion/Columns/land-developers-speculate-on-alr-land.html
http://lailayuile.com/2011/02/06/falcons-follies-gatewaysfpr-and-the-railgate-connection/#comment-9328
http://lailayuile.com/2011/02/08/falcons-follies-part-2/
http://deltafreepress.ca/201102161563/Opinion/Columns/land-developers-speculate-on-alr-land.html
http://lailayuile.com/2011/02/06/falcons-follies-gatewaysfpr-and-the-railgate-connection/#comment-9328
http://lailayuile.com/2011/02/08/falcons-follies-part-2/
# posted by 
: June 1, 2011 at 8:16 a.m.
: June 1, 2011 at 8:16 a.m.
Thanks, Anonymous 8:16, for the extra support for Laila's excellent work on these Delta matters (among many others).
Laila's blog is listed #3 on my blog-roll (left margin) and I always assume that people are checking those recommended sites.
And yes, these horrors don't develop fully formed overnight, they are the product of many years in the planning.
Laila's blog is listed #3 on my blog-roll (left margin) and I always assume that people are checking those recommended sites.
And yes, these horrors don't develop fully formed overnight, they are the product of many years in the planning.
It's time for a general strike as OUR Rights have been taken away Re: BCSC threw out the biggest political corruption scandal in the history of BC and possibly Canada!
I believe that no matter what we do or say in this OUR PROVINCE WE lose, so lets use the only tool WE seem to have left is a general strike!
I believe that no matter what we do or say in this OUR PROVINCE WE lose, so lets use the only tool WE seem to have left is a general strike!
# posted by : June 1, 2011 at 9:57 a.m.
: June 1, 2011 at 9:57 a.m.
SO TRUE ! Which just goes to reveal that the Liberals in this province have been for a long time, in the back pockets of Global corporations who want to increase tapping( big time) raw resources and good tax paying citizens and we also make good consumers.
WE ARE THE NEW PLANTATION!!! The Liberals of B.C. have long been in the corporations back pockets and will do everything possible to stay there.
Hold onto your wallets everyone, with whatever change you have left; it seems the provincial gov't has "sold the farm" from right out under our feet!
I still can't understand how people of B.C. are so willing to pay for the Basi-Virk legal costs when Mr. Campbell publicly stated that they were guilty and they willingly complied to his analysis. AND WE THE CITIZENS OF THIS PROVINCE WENT ALONG WITH PAYING FOR THE 7 YEAR PROCESS LEADING TO A GUILTY VERDICT???
WE ARE THE NEW PLANTATION!!! The Liberals of B.C. have long been in the corporations back pockets and will do everything possible to stay there.
Hold onto your wallets everyone, with whatever change you have left; it seems the provincial gov't has "sold the farm" from right out under our feet!
I still can't understand how people of B.C. are so willing to pay for the Basi-Virk legal costs when Mr. Campbell publicly stated that they were guilty and they willingly complied to his analysis. AND WE THE CITIZENS OF THIS PROVINCE WENT ALONG WITH PAYING FOR THE 7 YEAR PROCESS LEADING TO A GUILTY VERDICT???
# posted by : June 1, 2011 at 10:14 a.m.
: June 1, 2011 at 10:14 a.m.
It surprises me in a way that the new Minister of Transportation, ex Minister of Energy Blair Lekstrom would support a Foreign Trade Zone, whne he can see first hand every day the damage being done to BC's economy by multi national gas producers, who will do anything possible to avoid putting BC residents and the BC companies that employ them to work. If you aren't from Alberta don't waste their time. Alberta based service companies who do nothing to support the BC economy are carpet bagging the province much like the FTZ proponents would do. But then his flip flop on the HsT is a bit hard to understand as well. Nobody knows what the trade off was so far.
# posted by : June 1, 2011 at 8:33 p.m.
: June 1, 2011 at 8:33 p.m.
Oh well!!Mr. Leckstrom, now loves the HST. Typical of a BC Liberal turncoat. Leckstom is just another liar to contend with. He can stuff his FTZ.
Alberta also wants to carpet bag, the Enbridge pipeline and the filthy tar sludge, into Chinese tankers, onto the BC citizens. The BC people gain nothing for that, and BC gets all the risks of a tanker spill and a pipe burst.
They can keep the filthy crap in Alberta, and find another way to aid the biggest, worst polluted country in the world, China. Campbell and Harper worked together on that project.
Campbell and Harper have also worked, to drill oil and gas wells, off BC's coast, expect that too.
Wikileaks said, the N.A.U. is on the way. They were just waiting for Harper's majority. They will implement the N.A.U. in increments. We must be prepared, to accept many strange government actions, that make no sense to the citizens. Non of our natural resources and asset stolen from us, have lightened the load of the asinine taxes, for the BC people.
The HST was stolen from the BC people, to give to big business. Follow the money, who has benefited from the HST, certainly not the people it was thieved from.
Canada has produced the worst crop of corrupt politicians, in the history of Canada. They lie, deceive, cheat, are corrupt, dirty tactics, arrogance, employ criminals, have criminal charges, in contempt of the House, lie in the BC Legislature, steal our tax dollars to pay corrupt BC criminals legal fees, sneaky and underhanded, behind the back politicians. Most of them are not worth the powder, to blow them to hell. They are all about, greed, greed and more greed.
Post a Comment
Alberta also wants to carpet bag, the Enbridge pipeline and the filthy tar sludge, into Chinese tankers, onto the BC citizens. The BC people gain nothing for that, and BC gets all the risks of a tanker spill and a pipe burst.
They can keep the filthy crap in Alberta, and find another way to aid the biggest, worst polluted country in the world, China. Campbell and Harper worked together on that project.
Campbell and Harper have also worked, to drill oil and gas wells, off BC's coast, expect that too.
Wikileaks said, the N.A.U. is on the way. They were just waiting for Harper's majority. They will implement the N.A.U. in increments. We must be prepared, to accept many strange government actions, that make no sense to the citizens. Non of our natural resources and asset stolen from us, have lightened the load of the asinine taxes, for the BC people.
The HST was stolen from the BC people, to give to big business. Follow the money, who has benefited from the HST, certainly not the people it was thieved from.
Canada has produced the worst crop of corrupt politicians, in the history of Canada. They lie, deceive, cheat, are corrupt, dirty tactics, arrogance, employ criminals, have criminal charges, in contempt of the House, lie in the BC Legislature, steal our tax dollars to pay corrupt BC criminals legal fees, sneaky and underhanded, behind the back politicians. Most of them are not worth the powder, to blow them to hell. They are all about, greed, greed and more greed.
# posted by : June 2, 2011 at 10:58 a.m.
: June 2, 2011 at 10:58 a.m. << Home
